bruins4thecup65
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2011
- 4,126
- 2,031
This is far better than your other one. I hope you realize that, by your offers, the difference between Reinhart and Tkatchuk is about 30 spots in the draft. Tkatchuk is way better that that.To Buffalo : Debrusk, Vaakanen , 2rd pick
To Boston : Sam Reinhart
No ,but as a Bruins fan ,I would not like it . I proposed a deal with Arizona for Garland and some one replied that he does not hit and is soft , well he 5 inches shorter 30 lbs lighter and hits more than ReinhartThis is far better than your other one. I hope you realize that, by your offers, the difference between Reinhart and Tkatchuk is about 30 spots in the draft. Tkatchuk is way better that that.
Not a Sabres fan but I don’t think they’d hate it.
To Buffalo : Debrusk, Vaakanen , 2rd pick
To Boston : Sam Reinhart
I f***ing hate it. Not close. Not remotely close.This is far better than your other one. I hope you realize that, by your offers, the difference between Reinhart and Tkatchuk is about 30 spots in the draft. Tkatchuk is way better that that.
Not a Sabres fan but I don’t think they’d hate it.
I f***ing hate it. Not close. Not remotely close.
I f***ing hate it. Not close. Not remotely close.
Is Tkachuk really that much more valuable than Reinhart?This is far better than your other one. I hope you realize that, by your offers, the difference between Reinhart and Tkatchuk is about 30 spots in the draft. Tkatchuk is way better that that.
Not a Sabres fan but I don’t think they’d hate it.
To Buffalo : Debrusk, Vaakanen , 2rd pick
To Boston : Sam Reinhart
I stand corrected then lolI f***ing hate it. Not close. Not remotely close.
One look through your most recent post history says everything we need to know aboit your biased opinions.Is Tkachuk really that much more valuable than Reinhart?
Have you seen Tkachuk's QO when his contract is up?
Your analogy doesn't quite work.One look through your most recent post history says everything we need to know aboit your biased opinions.
This comment is basically the same as saying "Is McDavid really that much more valuable than Eichel? Have you seen the difference in their cap hits?"
No no, I think I got my point across quite clearlyYour analogy doesn't quite work.
The gap between McDavid and Eichel is alot more than Reinhart and Tkachuk.
Better luck next time.
Also... Tkachuk's QO is 3.8m higher than Reinhart, McDavid makes 2.5m more than Eichel.
Your point was to try and attack my post history for some reason, rather than my actual post.No no, I think I got my point across quite clearly
My point was your opinion on Tkachuk is clearly biased, he is quite obviously the better player than Reinhart. Just like how McDavid is quite obviously the better player than EichelYour point was to try and attack my post history for some reason, rather than my actual post.
I never said he wasn't the better player, just is he that much more valuable when taking his QO into account.My point was your opinion on Tkachuk is clearly biased, he is quite obviously the better player than Reinhart. Just like how McDavid is quite obviously the better player than Eichel
Still quite a lot more value, If you had the option between Marner or Keller who would you take? Taking their contracts into consideration of courseI never said he wasn't the better player, just is he that much more valuable when taking his QO into account.
I don’t think the OP is that bad. Add Beecher and up the 2nd to a 1st, and deal.
Are we trading for eichel or what, I must be missing something here big time. So you expect the Bruins to pony up
Debrusk, Vaak, Beecher and a first for Reinhart. I like Reinhart, but common man.
Yes and no way in hell that Debrusk, Vaak, Beecher and a first even gets you near Eichel.Are we trading for eichel or what, I must be missing something here big time. So you expect the Bruins to pony up
Debrusk, Vaak, Beecher and a first for Reinhart. I like Reinhart, but common man.
FIFY.To Buffalo : Debrusk , 2rd pick
To Boston : Taylor Hall