Speculation: Brett Pesce's next contract

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
48,359
97,935
(Not Slavin’s partner as often?)
He hasn't been Slavin's partner since about 2017

He was with Faulk in 18-19
It was a hodgepodge in 19-20
He's been with Skjei pretty much ever since then.

He's been dealing with some injuries and his "poor play" is a bit exaggerated IMO. He and Skjei are the guys that have taken on the toughest assignments for the last 3 seasons. Slavin has been the stabilizing force on his pairing with Hamilton, DeAngelo and now Burns. Given the offensive ability of those 3, that pairing, that left Skjei-Pesce to do the heavy lifting defensively.

That said, he's been a good skater but a guy with a choppy stride and has had some injuries. His game isn't foot speed though, it's smarts and being able to process things quickly.

I'd be wary of giving him a long term deal simply because of the injuries and the fact that his skating style could be susceptible to degrading (speculation).
 
Last edited:

NotOpie

"Puck don't lie"
Jun 12, 2006
9,267
17,806
North Carolina
Ideally, probably even for the Canes, they'd be willing to go to 4 years (5 at the outside), but they're not paying a salary that starts with a 6 and ends with an *illion.
I'd probably do 5 X $5 million or 4 X $5.5 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw

Jarvi

Registered User
Mar 22, 2012
459
230
Any chance the Canes move him before the TDL if they don't feel they will re-sign him? I know moving a top 4 D from a contender seems like a pipedream, but maybe they have a replacement in mind or would like to swap him out for a top 6 fwd and have a lesser D fill his role.

Not sure how he would fit this year, but he is what Edmonton has needed for a long while.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,547
18,711
I thought the Lindholm extension in Boston was a good comparable. He got $6.5mil x 8yrs. I think Lindholm is a bit better, so I think $6-6.5mil x 7-8yrs would be "fair." If they want shorter, maybe $7mil x 4-5yrs.
 

SlavinAway

Registered Jerk
Sponsor
Jul 7, 2017
2,928
11,203
Any chance the Canes move him before the TDL if they don't feel they will re-sign him? I know moving a top 4 D from a contender seems like a pipedream, but maybe they have a replacement in mind or would like to swap him out for a top 6 fwd and have a lesser D fill his role.

Not sure how he would fit this year, but he is what Edmonton has needed for a long while.
I'd say this is probably as close to a 0% chance as you can get.
 

TheReelChuckFletcher

Former TheRillestPaulFenton; Harverd Alum
Jun 30, 2011
10,154
22,678
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
I think that there's an underrated chance that Pesce sticks around in Carolina. Canes are not the type of team to overpay, but they do value different things than some other teams. I could easily see a situation where the Canes and Pesce find a number that works, especially because his poor offensive numbers this year could be a turn-off for potential overpays.
 

Unsustainable

Seth Jarvis is Elite
Apr 14, 2012
37,939
105,010
North Carolina
I can see him moved at the draft maybe if terms cant be made.

I think the FO has shown a willingness to acquire Dmen. Chychyrn could be a potential target to replace him. Slavin is likely the only one to stay till retirement in the Defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GIN ANTONIC

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,880
14,897
Toronto, ON
I've been one of the more critical Canes fans re: Pesce over the last few years... and that's not to say I don't like him as a player, but I would say about 2 years ago Skjei surpassed him as to who was the better D-man on that pair and the gap has widened significantly at this point.

As others has mentioned, Pesce is a smart, positionally sound d-man, who plays more physical that his size... not that he's small... he's like 6'2/6'3... but he isn't a big guy. He has A LOT of hard and heavy minutes on him as his bread and butter is shutting things down through board play and net front presence. He plays a tough gritty game and while not an amazing skater he is decent for his style of play, but that is starting to fade.

Over this season and last, he has been getting beat more and more by quicker forwards and this isn't something he's going to get better at. He doesn't have the same stick work, skating, and positional awareness like Slavin to calmly thwart zone entries and threats before they happen.

He has put up some decent offensive numbers in the past for his style of play but he doesn't really have good offensive skills. His passing is average, and I'd say when the puck is on his stick it's borderline... seeing more and more turnovers over the last two seasons. He doesn't have a strong shot but he's smart with it.

He can continue to hang for a few more years as a 3 on a weak team or a 4 on a good team but in 2-3 years he's probably bottom pairing/veteran mentor type.

Signing him to an AAV that start with a $6+ is going to be a huge mistake if there is any significant term on that. If the Canes could bring him back on a 3-4 year deal at $4.5-5.5 then I'd be fine with that. Otherwise I hope he gets his big time payday from another team. He's worked hard and he's a complete gamer, but as others have mentioned, he's slowing and the wheels are gonna fall off in 2-3 years most likely.
 

cheesymc

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
3,728
1,521
Irvine
Visit site
His regression has been quite bad... he might need to take a prove it contract, but that hasn't turn out well for many players like Klingberg, Dumba, etc.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,880
14,897
Toronto, ON
His regression has been quite bad... he might need to take a prove it contract, but that hasn't turn out well for many players like Klingberg, Dumba, etc.
He still has a very solid around the leafue as a strong defensive RHD who can play up and down the lineup, with a variety of partners and also play LD if needed. He will get at minimum 4x4 type offers and non playoff or bubble teams with money to spend might throw a 6x6 out there. Unless he wants a 1-2 year deal and then try again hoping for something better he won’t go that route. And in general as a defensive D man that’s not typically the way to get a better deal. Defensive D-men are generally underpaid vs their offensive counterparts do it would be hard for him to ‘look amazing’ for a year or two and then have that translate into a monster contract. He doesn’t play that type of game where he could sell himself to teams like that.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,926
38,954
colorado
Visit site
Any comments about his play this year? Thank you.
I think the slip in his play is pretty exaggerated. As a group we pick a couple of guys every year to criticize when we don’t win every night and Pesce drew the short stick sometime over the last year. He still makes great selfless defensive plays every night, and he can still move the puck. I think he looks a little stiffer and generally seems like he’s fighting off injuries, but I don’t really think he’s much slower. Both he and Slavin have lost a little bit of their jump, those tires have a lot of miles on them.

I don’t think I’d want to sign either one of them for more than five years but I’m sure someone will offer more. We’re going to have a real hard time replacing either of them.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $5,220.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $220.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad