EnforceTheLaus
In the Year of Our Hatter
- Nov 3, 2013
- 10,183
- 1,911
Looks like Pirri is on the trading block. I wonder if we can get someone for 2LW with Pirri + picks/ prospects.
Elliotte Friedman of Sportsnet said in a headline video today that Brandon Pirri is a "name to watch" meaning he could be on the trading block. Anyone think we deal him or will Tallon want to hold on to him? What could we get for him and what would we add?
Can he still be a 20+ goal scorer or is that impossible if teams continue to take away his time and space?
Here's the video:
Pirri literally fits the term "addition by subtraction", he doesn't score nearly enough to turn a blind eye to his weaknesses.these guys are idiots.
No way we are sellers.
We are looking to add scorers not subtract.
Best bet, a rebuilding team that has a spare mid6/bottom6 veteran. Otherwise I don't see much else for Pirri, wouldn't be that surprised if he ended up on waivers later on to the season.
Pirri literally fits the term "addition by subtraction", he doesn't score nearly enough to turn a blind eye to his weaknesses.
The most worrying part about his game, is that when he got here after the trade in 2014, he had that passion that he wanted to score on every shift he was out there and it seriously looked like it, he was dangerous offensively nearly on every shift. Even with the two streaks (2014 early season before the Yandle hit & the one towards the end of the season) that he's had, I haven't seen that from Pirri anymore. He just sort of is there. Reminds me of Versteeg tbh.
And trading away one guy that doesn't fit the puzzle isn't "selling".
Kulikov and Pirri for Dustin Byfuglien. MAKE IT HAPPEN TALLON
I find it funny how some in here thinks Kulikov have some high trade value. He is a borderline top 6 player, not a very good one. If you want quality you have to trade quality.
Blues fan said
Pirri plus a first can land Backes
20+ goal scorer and a 1st round pick for 31 year old that made 30+ goals two times??.. even i would say no to that one.
Yea but at least Backes isnt one dimensional thats for sure
Excuse my lack of effort in not quoting everyone I address, try and guess who.
One guy is (not) addressing me as some people (only guy who mentioned Kuli) and thinks I'm giving him value I'm not.
Two guys apparently wouldn't give Kulikov and Pirri for Byfuglien (maybe that who "some posters" must refer to cuz it ain't me). I should also mention they wouldn't give Pirri and Kulikov for Dustin Byfuglien. With a "hell no" to boot.
The fourth guy says we shouldn't go after Byfuglien because he's going to be a UFA, but going after another upcoming UFA with lesser value in Ladd is ok.
Is there a smiley for this situation? Oh yes. ""
Apologies to the first guy, he must not have been talking about me lol
Kuli will be a UFA after next year, and I for one wouldn't pay what he will want. He looked good against Washington but went back into a minus hockey IQ this last game. His latest history points to a guy who seems to understand his value is more in the defensive end than trying to be a puck moving defenseman. When he tries to be an offensive playmaker is when he goes into lala land. I personally doubt you will ever be able to get much in return for him other than a 2nd or 3rd plus an average scoring prospect in the AHL.well i don't know what thats all about, but if I'm the bolded area then yea i think that trading important assets to us like kulikov just for an upcoming free agent doesn't make any sense, if its picks and prospects and/or pirri then its fine. thats why i said maybe tallon goes after ladd early because we were talking about getting offensive help on the wing, which he is, and it wouldnt cost us a kulikov to get him, most likely a 1st, or pirri + 2nd, but not something as impactful as kulikov. but then again it wouldnt cost kulikov to go after buff early either, its just the notion to do it doesn't make sense. theres no need to trade him just for someone we can wait till the offseason to sign and lose no assets. we can do the same thing for ladd and just wait, and i would prefer to just wait and not waste assets, if its pirri +2nd then thats fine, a 1st? ill pass and wait personally.
Kulikov and Pirri for Dustin Byfuglien. MAKE IT HAPPEN TALLON
well i don't know what thats all about, but if I'm the bolded area then yea i think that trading important assets to us like kulikov just for an upcoming free agent doesn't make any sense, if its picks and prospects and/or pirri then its fine. thats why i said maybe tallon goes after ladd early because we were talking about getting offensive help on the wing, which he is, and it wouldnt cost us a kulikov to get him, most likely a 1st, or pirri + 2nd, but not something as impactful as kulikov. but then again it wouldnt cost kulikov to go after buff early either, its just the notion to do it doesn't make sense. theres no need to trade him just for someone we can wait till the offseason to sign and lose no assets. we can do the same thing for ladd and just wait, and i would prefer to just wait and not waste assets, if its pirri +2nd then thats fine, a 1st? ill pass and wait personally.