Hawkaholic
Registered User
Seems that way, so much for the 18-24 month timeline.This is basically admitting that the team is tanking and letting the young players develop next year as well, right?
Seems that way, so much for the 18-24 month timeline.This is basically admitting that the team is tanking and letting the young players develop next year as well, right?
No defending this nonsense
The generational tandem of Dylan Strome and Ian Mitchell will carry this team to the playoffs.This is basically admitting that the team is tanking and letting the young players develop next year as well, right?
The generational tandem of Dylan Strome and Ian Mitchell will carry this team to the playoffs.
My worst nightmare as a Hawks fan is for the Blackhawks to turn into the Buffalo Sabres:
Fixed for you. On our way there don’t worry. Fun times ahead. AlWaYs OnE gOaL....
We'd have to go through like 5 coaches (including Colliton) in the next 8 seasons to truly be like Buffalo. Eichel in Buffalo is like what Sale was with the Sox, a great player with a horrible team around him, a coach who doesn't know what he's doing, and absolutely horrific management.
The generational tandem of Dylan Strome and Ian Mitchell will carry this team to the playoffs.
You guys missed it a little so let me help...
Rocky only wants to make
money...he said as much...
McD makes him money...he's safe...
Scotty..I mean Stan is Mcd's guy because scotty walks on water according to McD,lose stan..lose scotty....rocky has made money while he's been a quivering mass of bumbling ineptitude...he's safe
JC...He's Stan's guy...so stan won't get rid of him because that's admitting another mistake...besides
he does what he's told and he's cheap...can't hire a "name-brand" coach...they cost money,thus negatively affecting rocky's
bottomline and profit margin...so JC makes rocky money.....he's safe
Do ya'll understand now??? As long as rocky is making money it's status quo until the sheep stopping buying
status quo.
BK is the one that brought them up. They are not bad trades per say but I definitely would not say they were "good" trades like BK did. My initial post was that it was ridiculous for Musto to say that Bowman returning is 100% the right way to go. Sounds like you agree.
They were 100% good trades that didn't impact the future but improved the team right away.
100%? You have a very low bar for what constitutes a good trade. Hmmm- if they were such good trades then why was the Hawks defense so bad? All at the low price of 4 M per year for each.
Why was the D so bad? Well to start the season they team had a bad system and Seabrook. Once the system changed and Seabrook left the lineup they improved . Neither Maatta or de Haan were part of the reason for the defensive issues. They actually carried far more than their share in their own end. You have a very poor understanding of why the team was bad defensively or hockey in general if you think Maatta or de Haan were part of the reason. You make those deals 11/10 times.
If McDavid and Draisatl are that good offensively, why did the Oilers finish in the bottom half of the league in goal scoring last year?100%? You have a very low bar for what constitutes a good trade. Hmmm- if they were such good trades then why was the Hawks defense so bad? All at the low price of 4 M per year for each.
If McDavid and Draisatl are that good offensively, why did the Oilers finish in the bottom half of the league in goal scoring last year?
Lol what? It wasn’t hard to comprehend, it just wasn’t a strong argument man. Two players do not make an offensive or defensive system. The hawks biggest issues in the defensive zone this year were on the wings and early in zone coverages.I guess an overarching, big picture question is too much for you to comprehend?