Drewcifer
Registered User
So, what was Yeo doing that made the team collapse every season in December/January?
Last edited:
So, what was Yeo doing that made the team collapse every season in December/January?
The team was just tuning out by this point IMO.
In December we'd always hear how we weren't good enough defensively and the goal scoring wouldn't last forever. The team can't win like that long term....Yeo would always be grumpy with a win when the Wild scored 4-5 goals and gave up 2-3...they weren't sticking to the system.
Then a NYR game would happen, go up 4-0 with Kuemper in net...lose 5-4 and Yeo would go all "told you so" and clamp down on them. The players then stop believing.
Yeo was and is a disgrace to the National Hockey League. He wants it to be similar to flag football. His disdain for the physical part of the game nearly ruined hockey for me.
Boudreau comes from the old WHA and Fighting Saints team. He understands the importance of the physical end of hockey. He also allows his players creativity offensively. Something Yeo severely prohibited!
It isn't a coincidence that St. Louis is struggling from their usual play.
Great, the Blues already have a GM that's hurting the franchise and I guess we're getting a coach to match too? A lot of trepidation here in STL about Yeo taking over next year. A lot of fans here are hoping he'd be more inclined to play the young kids more but it sounds like on here that isn't the case.
So Yeo isn't big on physical play? That's nice.
What about retaliation? A lot of people here were at least hoping Yeo was more open to retaliation if warranted. That's one thing that upset Blues fans about Hitchcock, he never called for retaliation when it was needed. 3 years ago against the Hawks in a playoff series, he let Bickell have his way with us. What about Yeo, is he like that or is he tougher?
Boudreau brought some really qualified assistant coaches with him. Yeo's assistants were Andrew Brunette and Darby Hendrickson. Were Yeo's assistants even qualified to be NHL coaches?
But Boudreau’s handling of players has set a tone of accountability woven through the best first half in team history. His deft touch with in-game adjustments and willingness to ride a hot hand demonstrate just how much coaching matters.
“We’re all men,†Boudreau said. “If somebody is not going as well, then he doesn’t play as much. It’s a fine line, but I think it’s a pretty easy line to follow.â€
Refreshing approach, isn’t it?
...
Boudreau prefers private meetings to clear the air rather than rant and rave like a lunatic. He tries to hold individual meetings with players every 10 to 20 games. Some take five minutes, some a half-hour.
Boudreau asks about their families and their personal lives before dissecting their performance on the ice. He sets his expectations and allows them to share their thoughts. Players probably never leave the room wondering where they stand.
“It’s a conversation you don’t normally get to have just sitting in the dressing room talking to players,†he said.
Boudreau’s résumé gives him credibility. A veteran coach with a record of success commands respect. Players know he’s not just winging it. They have to accept criticism or a demotion because they can’t pretend to know more than a coach who has seen just about everything in the game.
...
“If one doesn’t play as much in one game, it’s not because we don’t like him,†Boudreau said. “Somebody might just be going better at that time. It’s not fair to the guys that are playing better to not be able to play just because somebody is supposedly on a higher line.â€
That’s the mark of a confident coach, having an ability to demand accountability of every player while also maintaining respect inside the locker room.
Boudreau said his style has evolved with experience. He coached Alex Ovechkin in Washington and Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry in Anaheim, so he’s well-versed in handling players with stature.
“I’m still cognizant of how much guys play and how much ice time they need,†he said. “It’s just when push comes to shove, you want the best for your team because when you win, everyone seems to be happy.â€
Boudreau prefers private meetings to clear the air rather than rant and rave like a lunatic
Great, the Blues already have a GM that's hurting the franchise and I guess we're getting a coach to match too? A lot of trepidation here in STL about Yeo taking over next year. A lot of fans here are hoping he'd be more inclined to play the young kids more but it sounds like on here that isn't the case.
So Yeo isn't big on physical play? That's nice.
What about retaliation? A lot of people here were at least hoping Yeo was more open to retaliation if warranted. That's one thing that upset Blues fans about Hitchcock, he never called for retaliation when it was needed. 3 years ago against the Hawks in a playoff series, he let Bickell have his way with us. What about Yeo, is he like that or is he tougher?
I was thinking about this today, I don't think Staal signs with us if Yeo is the coach. There seems to be a lot of mutual respect between Staal/Boudreau, and by their quotes in the papers about each other and the signing the conversation Staal had with Boudreau was a big reason for his signing here, and I don't think Yeo would have that ability.
Production should be expected, and it's nice to see it rewarded (i.e. things like Schroeder being on the ice for his assist on Spurgeon's OT game winner a while back). He never would have seen the ice under Yeo.
Yeo's whole strategy with the 3on3 OT was just baffling. The fastest players, who could more easily exploit the 3on3 game would often ride the bench while Koivu and Vanek are on the ice for a two minute shift. I swear Klingberg alone beat us with at least 2 OT winners last year in that same scenario.
Also, didn't Yeo justify our terrible 3on3 OT record last year with a comment like "well, there's no 3on3 in the playoffs", or was that just made up?
Great, the Blues already have a GM that's hurting the franchise and I guess we're getting a coach to match too? A lot of trepidation here in STL about Yeo taking over next year. A lot of fans here are hoping he'd be more inclined to play the young kids more but it sounds like on here that isn't the case.
So Yeo isn't big on physical play? That's nice.
What about retaliation? A lot of people here were at least hoping Yeo was more open to retaliation if warranted. That's one thing that upset Blues fans about Hitchcock, he never called for retaliation when it was needed. 3 years ago against the Hawks in a playoff series, he let Bickell have his way with us. What about Yeo, is he like that or is he tougher?
Don't let these other Wild fans fool you.... be afraid, be VERY afraid!
Yeo has HIS system and his favorites (usually vets). If you don't adhere to "The System" you will not play.... unless you are a vet. And physical play.... oh NO!!! we don't do that under Yeo! We expect the NHL to change from what they've always done and protect the little guys. We all know, one guy punches another guy, guy falls down.... 2 minute roughing on both. Yeo never realize this. The NHL is a physical/intimidating sport and ALWAYS will be.
I've been a hockey fan since the early 70's and Mike Yeo is by far the worst hockey coach I've ever been associated with. He may know his X's and O's... .but there is WAY MORE to coaching than that.
As a MN Hockey fan I really hope Yeo takes the reigns for the Blues, but as a Blues fan, you really don't want that to happen.
I always thought the team Fletcher was trying to build and Yeo's strict defensive, systematic coaching never meshed well. Fletcher want's a fast, skilled, two way team and Yeo wanted a defense first, dump and chase grind it out hockey.
It's not surprising so many players are thriving under Boudreau who coaches to the players strengths and puts them in a position where they can succeed. Yeo didn't care what your skill asset was. It was stick to the system at all costs.
Well said.
For those Wild fans still wondering, how many times this season have we already carried the puck into the offensive zone compared to last year?.... or the yearS before?
Not just the amout of carry-ins, the dump ins seem to have a purpose this year. Seasons past it was just the the puck deep without much thought of where it was going. Just in their zone and try and get it.
Don't let these other Wild fans fool you.... be afraid, be VERY afraid!
Yeo has HIS system and his favorites (usually vets). If you don't adhere to "The System" you will not play.... unless you are a vet. And physical play.... oh NO!!! we don't do that under Yeo! We expect the NHL to change from what they've always done and protect the little guys. We all know, one guy punches another guy, guy falls down.... 2 minute roughing on both. Yeo never realize this. The NHL is a physical/intimidating sport and ALWAYS will be.
I've been a hockey fan since the early 70's and Mike Yeo is by far the worst hockey coach I've ever been associated with. He may know his X's and O's... .but there is WAY MORE to coaching than that.
As a MN Hockey fan I really hope Yeo takes the reigns for the Blues, but as a Blues fan, you really don't want that to happen.
The difference is noticeable.