Proposal: Blues - Rangers

[RangersFan1994]

Marco Scandella to Rangers for 4th in 2024?


Rangers get defensive depth for playoffs.

Click to read more...

 

[BlueDream]

Blues accept.

 

[Linkens Mastery]

Works for me. Where do I sign up?

 

[Blanick]

I don't think you will get too much push back from Blues fans on this one. 4th is fair for Scandella and I can't imagine there is any interest in bringing him back from management.

 

[Ted Hoffman]

With or without retention? Cause ... a 4th without retention would be fantastic.

 

[BrokenFace]

The most value we could get for Marco is as a smaller piece of a bigger trade that gets us a large return. If he's not included in a trade like that, then a 4th is fine for him.

 

[Lindberg Cheese]

With or without retention? Cause ... a 4th without retention would be fantastic.

It would have to be 50%, so a 4th isn’t crazy just decent

 

[WhereO Is Kakko]

Marco Scandella to Rangers for 4th in 2024?


Rangers get defensive depth for playoffs.

“defensive depth”? The guy is a possession black hole.

 

[Ted Hoffman]

It would have to be 50%, so a 4th isn’t crazy just decent

No, as others mention above that's about what I expect. If teams get into a bidding war for some reason, I can see a 3rd + low prospect, but that's getting way out there for expectations. I would think a 4th would do it, and if we have to take a contract back to help with the cap we get a low prospect for it.

 

[stl76]

3rd round pick is basically the going rate for bottom pairing rental dmen.

If a team wants Scandella with 50% retention, I'd be pushing for a 3rd.

 

[2014nyr]

looking at his numbers this season tho, he's playing about 12 mins a night, doesn't seem to throw many hits, doesn't block many shots, and doesn't drive possession. i guess the good news is he's a plus 1 and appears to be serviceable in a limited pk role. i'm not sure where his value ultimately lands....i wouldn't be surprised if this is pretty close...but i don't think he at all fits the player profile drury has in mind. he seems to be targeting an absolute nailgun as the main priority, while the ability to do things like skate, make a breakout pass, or handle the puck competently are optional.

 

[SML2]

looking at his numbers this season tho, he's playing about 12 mins a night, doesn't seem to throw many hits, doesn't block many shots, and doesn't drive possession. i guess the good news is he's a plus 1 and appears to be serviceable in a limited pk role. i'm not sure where his value ultimately lands....i wouldn't be surprised if this is pretty close...but i don't think he at all fits the player profile drury has in mind. he seems to be targeting an absolute nailgun as the main priority, while the ability to do things like skate, make a breakout pass, or handle the puck competently are optional.

I have no idea what you're talking about when you refer to a player as a nailgun. A shooter? A physical guy? What are we talking about?

 

[2014nyr]

I have no idea what you're talking about when you refer to a player as a nailgun. A shooter? A physical guy? What are we talking about?

a real piece of sht to play against

 

[Stupendous Yappi]

The retention isn’t a big deal except if the Blues need to retain on other deals. We expect to need retention for Buchnevich. Can’t frivolously use all their spots on an insignificant trade.

But a 4th, 3rd with retention is fine. Do you not need to send any salary back?

 

[bleedblue94]

I am more curious if the blues would trade hayes at 50% retained and at what cost?

 

[PocketNines]

retention, no retention, just gimme a 3d round pick