Scandeezy about to get traded because of Kessel.Krug-Kessel with another strong game(despite Torey making three absolutely horrific passes in the first five minutes of the game). Shot attempts were 12-10 in favor of the Blues with that pairing on the ice and they had a 76%xGoals%, so they were getting quality chances as well as quantity. I think Perunovich is going to sit for Kessel when Faulk returns. Or maybe Scandella...
kessel has been really unnoticeable almost this entire time he has been in there. which for guy like him is great.Krug-Kessel with another strong game(despite Torey making three absolutely horrific passes in the first five minutes of the game). Shot attempts were 12-10 in favor of the Blues with that pairing on the ice and they had a 76%xGoals%, so they were getting quality chances as well as quantity. I think Perunovich is going to sit for Kessel when Faulk returns. Or maybe Scandella...
I’d love to see Peru-Kessel as the bottom pairing whenever Faulk returnsKrug-Kessel with another strong game(despite Torey making three absolutely horrific passes in the first five minutes of the game). Shot attempts were 12-10 in favor of the Blues with that pairing on the ice and they had a 76%xGoals%, so they were getting quality chances as well as quantity. I think Perunovich is going to sit for Kessel when Faulk returns. Or maybe Scandella...
I would be fine with them putting Faulk on the bottom pair with Peru to start off. Let me play some easy minutes and get back into the groove of things.I’d love to see Peru-Kessel as the bottom pairing whenever Faulk returns
when do we talk about how faulk and krug are mismatched pair? krug and kessel seem much better fit, as faulk and krug both would benefit from partner who plays simpler game.I would be fine with them putting Faulk on the bottom pair with Peru to start off. Let me play some easy minutes and get back into the groove of things.
when do we talk about how faulk and krug are mismatched pair? krug and kessel seem much better fit, as faulk and krug both would benefit from partner who plays simpler game.
I think Buchy originally thought he missed it.
What was Buchy mad about?
One of the stranger reactions to an ENG. lol.
he was pissed cos he missed the empty net the first time, few minutes b4Buch 2 handing the glass after a ENG for him makes me crack up everytime I watch it.
Probably the last reaction you’d think of after scoring a goal
Damn you trains, damn you. Work better... lol.
Faulk could actually use a more defensive partner as well. That’s not Perunovich.I would be fine with them putting Faulk on the bottom pair with Peru to start off. Let me play some easy minutes and get back into the groove of things.
I would entertain dressing 7 D when Faulk returns and rotate in Scandella/Perunovich depending on game score/special teams situations. Keep Krug-Kessel in tact. I would take 7 D over the X useless plug currently occupying a wing spot on the 4th line.Faulk could actually use a more defensive partner as well. That’s not Perunovich.
Just let Peru play wing.I would entertain dressing 7 D when Faulk returns and rotate in Scandella/Perunovich depending on game score/special teams situations. Keep Krug-Kessel in tact. I would take 7 D over the X useless plug currently occupying a wing spot on the 4th line.
It’s always fun to read the GDT of big market teams when the Blues are winning in the 3rd. Funny ass commentary.