MBH
Players Play
So it's actually a yes, as long as it's 5 years. That's crazy to me, why would you trade Larkin but keep Bertuzzi, if you are moving Larkin then you should be moving Bertuzzi as well, who is a year older. Since you worry so much about Larkin's final years.
It's just ass backwards thinking.
Already told you.
1. Larkin is going to make far more.
2. Larkin's contract is 3 years longer.
On the back end of a deal, I'd rather get stuck with 1 bad overpaid year at $7M than 2-3 bad years at $9.5M.
How do you not understand a concept so f***ing simple.