I mean players. Do they switch players up if one side is dominating?
Nope! Did in every other previous BF title but not this one. You basically have to wait for the good players on the other team to get bored and leave.
I mean players. Do they switch players up if one side is dominating?
noI mean players. Do they switch players up if one side is dominating?
I always leave if it's unbalanced. It ain't worth it.Yeah the team balance is the biggest issue for me in this game. If you join a game and your team is bad, then youre stuck with that team forever unless you leave the game. Its not fun getting curbstomped 10 games in a row, nor is it fun doing the curbstomping 10 times in a row.
if they would fix team balance id play this game a lot more
Just play the pacific maps. The game might as well not exist outside those 3 maps. Before you complain about lack of content just do it. You'll see that conquest or breakthrough through those 3 maps is good enough to entertain. The only bad thing is the lack of team balance. But you'll never get your tides of war skin if you don't start now. Get going!!I mean...I still enjoy the game. Battlefield is Battlefield, and even in an admittedly **** form like BFV kind of is, it still has moments that make me remember why I enjoy Battlefield. But I can understand from people why they don't want to deal with the game - and any sort of half decent move DICE makes is a case of going one step forward, and a mile back.
The thing that frustrates me the most though is Firestorm. I admit that probably like most people I groaned seeing DICE jump on the battle royale bandwagon. But the games I have played of it, it works, really well. The gunplay felt good. But like...the mode has more or less been crystallized in amber as the rest of DICE is all hands on deck to un**** the main online mode. No major updates, no new guns added. No new areas. I remember reading that Criterion was dealing with Firestorm - and now I read that Criterion is welcoming back the people from Gothenberg and Ghost Games and transitioning post launch content for Need for Speed Heat. So like, has that been what they've been doing instead of Firestorm?
So many problems with the game, and Firestorm truly feels like a microcosm of them, alongside the other problems. Again, I don't blame people for having tapped out. Even now, as much as I enjoy playing the game, I find myself going back to Battlefield 1 specifically (Certainly isn't helped by my monster K/D ratio ha) but BFV is in a very bad state, probably worst then even the lowest points BF4 had. And I don't think that DICE is going to be able to make people trust them again, nor are they going to have a miraculous turnaround like BF4 did, or more recently Battlefront II.
Lot of people very upset about this game or the end of updates. This and Battlefront 2
The EA hate is strong rn
The reddit is awful. All they do is complain and post anti-EA or anti-DICE crap. "How dare EA start working on Battlefield 6." They also claim BFV is so awful or "I would quit this and go back to BF1" lmao what about BF1 was so exciting that you would willingly downgrade to play it?
I really loved this game, but the matchmaking made it tough to stay with it long-term, especially since I have an 8 month old son and still work full time. I just don't have as much time to play, so if the hour or so I can put in every few days is wasted on a terribly one-sided battle; it loses its lust quickly.
Has the matchmaking got any better? I'm a pretty mediocre player, so if my team is getting crushed, then I'm getting completely destroyed since I don't have a great skill set to overcome such a disparity between teams.
I tried to give it a shot a month or so ago, and gave up pretty quickly. I've been playing more Battlefront, which is way more forgiving for those of us who aren't very good gamers.
new trailer is up for the Solomon islands. The Pacific expansion is the gift that keeps on giving.