That's right....what about now?
You mean after a gigantic 15 game sample size? Barzal is still better.
Barzal on ice sh% is 6.06% and his PDO is .962
Marner on ice sh% is 13.22% and his PDO 1.069
So Marner has benefited from about 50% better puck luck at this point and is due for downward regression, whereas Barzal should expect upwards regression.
You speculated that Marner wouldn't put up points if he played on the NYI.
The thread asks about overall play, not just points.
Both players can dominate when on the ice, you have seen Marner play right? He'll be wearing 16 tonight against the Devils.
I don't have to speculate that Barzal significantly outscored Marner last year, and was significantly better overall as well. He was a dominant possession player and play driver, much more so than Marner has ever been.
Its not speculation to understand that most predictable coach in the NHL is going to be predictable. Again, zero chance that Barzal would have played C on the Leafs last year - except as an injury replacement. Suggesting otherwise just shows that you understand nothing about Babcock.
Furthermore, just as it would have been completely stupid to use Nylander as the 3C last year, it would have been equally stupid to use Barzal as the 3C (and yes he would have been behind both Matthews and Kadri - Matthews was the 1C, and Kadri was the shutdown C).
I remember before Matthews rookie season many were predicting him to play 3C or wing because Babcock. So predictable, right?
Barzal is a dominant possession center, moreso than even Matthews.