So, I'm going a bit off the board here, and this I'm playing a dangerous game, but I can explain why quite easily. I think he will very soon be a legitimate top-200 player. Let's do a VERY RUDIMENTARY AND FLAWED COMPARISON THAT DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN I THINK PLAYER X IS BETTER THAN ANY OF THOSE GUYS:
Top -10 Points finishes and AST's and major trophies. These are all RW's:
Player X: 1, 4*, 5, 6. Two FAST's*, Two SASTs The *<--- Is important. Also one of the only Hart Trophy winners in the list I am making here.
Brett Hull: 2, 4, 5. Three FAST's. Hart Trophy Winner.
Yvan Cournoyer: 6, 8. Four SAST's. Conn Smythe Trophy Winner.
Cam Neely: Never made top 10 in points. Four SAST's.
Jarome Iginla: 1, 3, 8. Three FAST's One SAST. Hart Finalist a couple of times.
Pavel Bure: 2, 3, 5, 7. One Fast, Two SAST's.
Teemu Selanne: 2, 2, 5, 5, 7, 8. Two FAST's, Two SAST's.
Lanny McDonald: 8, 10. Two SAST's.
Rod Gilbert: 5, 5, 7, 8, 9. One FAST, One SAST.
Rick Middleton: 10, 10. One SAST.
Glen Anderson: 9. No AST's.
Tim Kerr: 9. One SAST.
One can see why I like this guy. (just a very basic comparison, but in it he stacks up extremely well to a lot of drafted RW's, and his AST record is pretty telling.)
Not only that, but this guy is actually a rather good two-way player, peaking at a 4th in Selke voting. He may not be the toughest or most intidimiating guy, but he's got a lot of heart.
He doesn't have the most extensive playoff record (quite worse than a number of RW's taken ahead of him that I'd like to compare him too), but he has rocked when he has gotten the opportunity, including a year of being 2nd in playoff scoring.
So what does the * mean? It means I'm projecting, so you can't actually count that fourth and 1 of his FASTs (yet), but if all goes well, then this guy will get 'em.
Who is Player X?
RW Martin St. Louis
And now the unveiled top line;
Nels Stewart-Ron Francis-Martin St.Louis