North Cole
♧ Lem
- Jan 22, 2017
- 11,661
- 13,179
Good thing its Eklund because Nylander is the most salvageable piece of that core. Trading him would be bad news.
Eklund is the NHL verison of Vince Russo.
Why does this site allow his BS to be posted?
One good idea in a ln ocean of shitty one's funneled by one of the best promoters ever isn't really considered a success.Not even that.
Vince Russo was successful at one point
One good idea in a ln ocean of shitty one's funneled by one of the best promoters ever isn't really considered a success.
Where do you go or who do you source on your essays? You frequent libraries?Citing Eklund as a source is the hockey rumour equivalent of referencing Wikipedia for an essay.
Ba dum tssWell that would be dumba
I don’t usually physically go to the library, but I try to aim for higher than “trust me, bro” as a source when I’m writing an essay.Where do you go or who do you source on your essays? You frequent libraries?
Encyclopedia Britannica?I don’t usually physically go to the library, but I try to aim for higher than “trust me, bro” as a source when I’m writing an essay.
This is the way.Eklund isn't a source lol
It would have to be a sign and trade and there would have to be a sweetener.... And why does Toronto make this deal? Dumba is a pending ufa, and Nylander is top line ppg winger.
Encyclopedia Britannica?
Feels like two separate thoughts conflated into one. Nylander will be moved, and with the cap space it frees up, the Leafs will try to sign Dumba. Not a Nylander for Dumba trade.