in the hall
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2004
- 5,009
- 0
alright i do admit those comments concerned me but i find it hard to believe what was said is something new to teams although i can believe jagrs situation couldve been worse then other teams.. still with that said the articles surely dont depit jagr as such a huge cancer and "one of the biggest cancers in sports"clefty said:Oh Christ, I'm not going to sift through 4 more years of articles. Getting back to 2001 took long enough. If you want the sources so bad, that task can be up to you.
And besides, one of those sources talks about his complaining on Kevin Constantine's coaching - back in 1999.
either way despite the entire arguments gone on in this thread i cant believe that jagr would have a negative affect on a prospect
i wonder if all those concerned for ovechkins poor soul are just as concerned for the barker, green, ladd, malkin, olesz.. one is bound to get picked.. i wonder if they about the emotional hit ovechkin takes once he is sent back to russia or juniors because his team can not afford him.. no that is not a knock that is a comment which is as ridiculous and very comperable to the notion the rangers will have such a negative affect on ovechkin
Last edited: