I didn't use pace. In fact even if we remove the pace, my argument strengthens because instead of putting up 90+ points at 22, Marner did it at 21. It would be back to back seasons at 22, but if you don't want to use pace, whatever.
You don't really have an arguement.
Anyways, I gave my opinion about Hall, and you decide to attack Marner for some reason and derail the thread. So I said my piece and am out.
I didn't attack Marner. You're totally out to lunch here, you realize. Let's take a look at the actual facts:
1. You claimed Hall didn't sniff 90 points
2. You claimed Marner posted 90 points in 2 back to back seasons -- then said the 2nd one (this season) is based on pace
3. I wrote out the respective players' paces
4. You claimed you didn't use pace
5. You claimed I derailed the thread (when I responded to your comparison of Hall to Marner and saying Hall didn't sniff 90 points)
6. You claim I'm attacking Marner (how? by saying that Hall is not categorically worse in point production? That's a ridiculously broad interpretation of 'attack')
In other words, you derailed the thread to make it about Marner and his 90 point pace this season and compare Hall to that. I responded exclusively to that objectively incorrect comparison. Then you threw your hands up to claim that I'm derailing the thread--because I'm responding to you! Sound logic indeed.