MessierII
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2011
- 27,831
- 16,507
Good PKer. Good forechecker. Has speed and finish. Could definitely use him on the 4th line. Miss him.
Would easily be the best 4th line we’ve had since the wagon line.A Benson-Sceviour-Archibald line would have been good 4th line, imo
I mean I guess, but I don't see it, he's got what has basically ended stalock's career. We should just move on.If he’s healthy, get him back in the mix and see what he can do. The team should care about winning hockey games and if Archibald can help in that regard you keep him around if not cut him loose.
I think he improves our hockey club.He is a strong fourth liner and can be used sparingly throughout the line up. Anyone who thinks the team is better off without him really needs to take a step back and reassess imo.
Yakupov has 17 points in 29 games in the KHL this season.Miss his hitting. Our PK is doing fine without him.
Still got him as my avatar but I think his career is over. Yak retired in KHL due to similar post covid issue and Stalock isn't coming back either.
I think he improves our hockey club.
But I still dont think hes a very good hockey player.
I think he improves our hockey club.
But I still dont think hes a very good hockey player.
Hmm maybe something lost in translation then.Yakupov has 17 points in 29 games in the KHL this season.
We're also way too bad defensively for the playoffs. Archibald hurts in that area. Doesn't help.When healthy he's a solid 4th line utility guy that can bring a much needed physical element to the club. Our team is way too soft for the playoffs IMO.
I dont think hes a strong 4th liner.Not to split hairs because I think I understand what you are saying but...
Even "just" being a strong fourth liner in the nhl is one of the best hockey players on the planet.
We're also way too bad defensively for the playoffs. Archibald hurts in that area. Doesn't help.
So who do you propose that we go out and get that is punishing physically and good defensively?
Honestly I'm fin with Sceviour in that role for now.
Not ideal, but imo he hurts you less from the 4th line than Archibald does.
I’m going to put his odds of playing another NHL game at 37 percent, five percent that he ever plays for the Oil again.
So who do you propose that we go out and get that is punishing physically and good defensively?
I'd propose Lawson Crouse.
Basically Archibald but 6'4 225 lbs.
I'd love to add Crouse, if the Coyotes fans value him the same as his GM they'd want Holland's left nut and right arm for him.
I was going to make a comment that may have been misinterpreted as rude in an attempt to be funny but instead Ill just ask... Where the f*** are you getting these numbers from?