Havoc
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2009
- 7,305
- 7,544
Rask wasn't Rask until he became Rask.
Yeah but our original discussion is about basing the decision on potential.
A 18 year old Rask gets lit up for 7 goals in a game the current Sparks gives up 6 but we would never dare pick anyone else over Rask (insert JFJ jokes here).
You and I disagree on that potential surrounding Sparks really meaning anything in the short term and long term. I don't think it does so I would have preferred to keep Mac.