Mickey the mouse
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2013
- 1,856
- 508
Does he have to stay on roster for 30 days or are there different rules for pre season waivers ?
They do until November 1.They stay number 1. Claiming a guy has no effect on waiver order.
Those totals are for the Anaheim, San Jose, and Columbus claims?For those interested, this cost Anaheim $67,500, paid to Ottawa and not counted against the cap.
Season total: $135,000
3 claims
How long does he need to stay up before he isn't returned to Ottawa's AHL team if they put him through again and nobody claims him?
If he goes back on Waivers and nobody claims him, he automatically goes back to Ottawa's AHL affiliate, no claim necessary. It's a fairly common sense rule to prevent teams from doing Waiver shenanigans to claim other teams' AHL guys and get them to their own AHL team.
There is no timeline at all for Thomson on AnaheimDoes he have to stay on roster for 30 days or are there different rules for pre season waivers ?
Precisely!Those totals are for the Anaheim, San Jose, and Columbus claims?
Thanks. Do you know if there’s any way to see what teams also put in claims on the claimed players?Precisely!
Unfortunately not that I know of.Thanks. Do you know if there’s any way to see what teams also put in claims on the claimed players?
Thanks for the response. Appreciate it. It would be interesting to be able to see claim submissions.Unfortunately not that I know of.
Occasionally you'll get an insider or beat writer saying, "A source with the team said Team X also put in a claim but had lower priority", but it's never released by the League. I'd love if they did release the complete waiver results though.
For those interested, this cost Anaheim $67,500, paid to Ottawa and not counted against the cap.
I thought they may claim Smith as well. But, Thomson being 6’ and more of a two way player is probably what intrigued Verbeek.Why you'd claim this guy over Ty Smith, is wild to me. Basically just picking him because he's a RH shot? Just reaffirms for me that the NHL is often very nearly arbitrary.
Maybe in addition to his side, they like him more as a player. Probably not that complicated.Why you'd claim this guy over Ty Smith, is wild to me. Basically just picking him because he's a RH shot? Just reaffirms for me that the NHL is often very nearly arbitrary.
Not a nominal claim.so they need to make a nominal claim to get him back to the AHL? Likely more of a formality, unless they really hated the guy for whatever reason
JBD is twice the playerIt's a good, no risk pick up. Wonder why we kept jbd over him, but they’re pretty equal I guess.
I wouldn't say that personally. He's better defensively for sure, but thomsons snap passes out of the zone were nice to have.JBD is twice the player
I thought they may claim Smith as well. But, Thomson being 6’ and more of a two way player is probably what intrigued Verbeek.
Even with what you’re describing, he’s still a better two way player than Smith which is what my point was. He’s slightly bigger and more of a two way player than Smith. He’s more competent defensively than Smith, without question. I never said whether he was good or not.He's not a two-way player. He's too low IQ to maintain proper gap control, gets walked more than any other D in the Sens organization and is prone to terrible giveaways in bad spots.
He's an offensive D that isn't skilled enough to play on the PP, which makes him pretty much useless.
I thought they may claim Smith as well. But, Thomson being 6’ and more of a two way player is probably what intrigued Verbeek.
JBD is twice the player
Agree to disagree. Smith is terrible in his own zone. He’s always been known as an offensive guy. Thomson was described as a two way when drafted and seemed perfectly fine at lower levels. He’s not even had 20 games at the NHL level yet so he has the opportunity to still show what he’s capable of. It’s a no risk pickup for Anaheim.Lassi is really not a two-way player. He's an offensive defenceman who can make a decent first pass and do a few things offensively. He's shown absolutely no real indications of any sort of NHL caliber defensive game.
Ty is what, an inch shorter? And has at least shown flashes of a far more developed defensive game. At an NHL level even. Lassi is still yet to even really show much of that at the AHL level.
Yeah. It never really seemed like a question to me, which of JBD or Lassi the Sens ought to keep. JBD hasn't established himself like you'd hope for by now, but he's a far better all-around prospect with a far more well-rounded game. There's like...one very niche element where Lassi might have the edge, but everything else seems like a pretty clear edge to JBD...which adds up to a far better player in total.