abev
Registered User
Is it safe so assume that in nearly every case of salary arbitration that the player has been made an offer and they feel they are worth more than that offer?
And is it also safe to assume that the club feels the player isnt worth as much as the player thinks he is?
Or can it just come down to a mutal agreement where the club says "lets not even talk $ and get involved in going back and forth, let an arbitrator do it."
I just have this feeling like arbitration means disagreement.
("You know what happens when you assume" responses not required)
And is it also safe to assume that the club feels the player isnt worth as much as the player thinks he is?
Or can it just come down to a mutal agreement where the club says "lets not even talk $ and get involved in going back and forth, let an arbitrator do it."
I just have this feeling like arbitration means disagreement.
("You know what happens when you assume" responses not required)