The team is what it is, high highs that make you think it has turned the corner and finally has learned what it takes to win and low lows that remind you they've been in the same holding pattern since 2011-12, and usually they finish off with a point total between 80-85.
You're totally correct in this approach, but its not the path that will be taken by Shanahan or whoever is pulling his strings once Lieweke bails. Seriously, this is Leaf culture. It's their M.O. Not bad enough to draft in top 5, not good enough to make playoffs or do damage once there.
Most recently JFJ wanted to blow it up post-Quinn and rebuild but was rebuffed with prejudice by his boss (so bye bye Raask, etc. to try to just make the playoffs). Same with Burke. Same with Nonis. Shanahan will continue this legacy.
Why fire Carlyle? It's the GM that brings in or dismisses players - the coach just massages what he's given. So we get a third "name" coach who was effective and respected elsewhere, but keep the player core who chew up and spit out two other bonafide NHL coaches?
Babcock is currently a cog in a fantastic hockey machine. In Toronto he will catastrophically fail under MLSE cultural pressure.
The best chance to get to the finals in 47 years was with the first overall pick riding shotgun for the Leafs - Wendel Clark. Hey, how about trying that approach just one more time?
Until their contracts expire unfortunately. Only players that can be moved are Kessel and the non core guys. No point moving Kessel and changing the non core guys isn't going to do much as has been demonstrated with the exception of the return of Komarov.This team lacks consistency. They have the talent to win, but just can't seem to hold it together for long. Pick a string of five games, and the team often looks different every night, win or loss.
I almost feel like this team is a group of talented players as opposed to a true "team" on the ice.
In terms of a fix, perhaps a core shifting trade (probably difficult to pull off), addition by subtraction kind of deal, or alternatively, a coaching change.
How long can this group keep playing like this until something happens?
This team lacks consistency. They have the talent to win, but just can't seem to hold it together for long. Pick a string of five games, and the team often looks different every night, win or loss.
I almost feel like this team is a group of talented players as opposed to a true "team" on the ice.
In terms of a fix, perhaps a core shifting trade (probably difficult to pull off), addition by subtraction kind of deal, or alternatively, a coaching change.
How long can this group keep playing like this until something happens?
I'd say for the most part most of our new players have come in with a work man like attitude and have been positives, but when the team falls apart it's usually to do with the old bad habits and weaknesses and lack of energy that characterizes the old core.
To use an analogy, the engine of this team only has a certain amount of horsepower on it. Really doesn't matter what the air freshener smells like.
Canucks have a bad year out goes the GM, the coach, Kesler, Luongo. In comes draft picks.
The Leafs have a bad 5 of 6 years, out goes draft picks everyone gets extended.
Culture.
The problem is that the Leafs are bad but so are the majority of teams in the East...They're probably just one of the "better" bad teams.
Hopefully that culture is slowly changing with Shanahan running things...He's a no nonsense smart guy...Hiring men like Hunter and Dubas is just the start----
I can't wait to see what he does next off-season...There should be a lot of changes.
Yet dismissed Carlyle's assistants while at the same time extending him which was a really odd thing to do.Shanahan extended the coach. The easiest change to make without moving any players. No one would have batted an eye if Carlyle was let go after last year. So any negative coaching posts are on Shanny.
Yet dismissed Carlyle's assistants while at the same time extending him which was a really odd thing to do.
The construction of this team in not about where you draft first and foremost is it? What is the needle in the hay stack that causes such extreme shifts from game to game. Who is the cause of it to a higher percentage and how do you fix it is what's important.
To blow it up immediately for picks and sarary cap space immediately does not answer to the compete level in itself though. We might need to jump on a high impact trade to some degree quite soon.
That could set a tone for our direction at the deadline.
If I had to look at who doesn't compete, Kessel comes to mind. He's also a huge reason why we win.
When the puck gets dumped into a corner and he's the leading forechecker, he doesn't do anything, he does not want to have any physical contact. He is easy to play against.
He also does a lot of special things though.
There are rumours the cap isnt going up going into next season.
Just to keep our current group together without even adding a piece in free agency, we'd need to give raises to Kadri, Bernier, Santorelli, and Franson. Even if those were only ~1M raises per player, it would still put us over the cap by 4M without adding a single piece.
Obviously we expect some young guys like Nylander, Percy, Leivo, Panik, Holland, etc to take on larger roles next season, so there's no reason to expect management to want to keep this exact roster together. But Id prefer to see us proactive and identify who we want to keep with those young guys, and who we don't, and move out some salary for some prospects, picks, etc that can give us more flexibility going forward.
Shanahan extended the coach. The easiest change to make without moving any players. No one would have batted an eye if Carlyle was let go after last year. So any negative coaching posts are on Shanny.
Every team has that problem, so who is taking on salary without giving some back?
If you want to move out salary be prepared to get bad value in return.
Hope_Smoke @Hope_Smoke · 4h 4 hours ago
Up next for the Leafs: Nsh, TB, Det, Pitt, Wsh, Dal, NJ & Van? Good luck Randy.
To their credit the players normally give excellent post loss interviews about their crappy team performance not being acceptable. Not that they actually ever back the talk up with actions but that's nitpicking.This next stretch of games will show what the team is made of.
I look to build around Reilly, jvr, bernier, nylander, and maybe kadri the rest can go
We're the definition of mediocre, not bad enough to get an elite top 5 pick but will land at 9th or 10th in the east. why not blow it up? Calgary for example has way less talent but they work their ass off. If our team ever did that they could accomplish something