It seems a lot of people are willing to put Jagr's '00 season quite a bit higher in this group than Crosby's '13 in the previous list of this type and I'm curious why? Both played a similar percentage of games and were the clear best player when healthy, winning the Lindsay. Jagr won the Art Ross, but Crosby just barely lost and Jagr benefitted more from other players missing time as well. Is it that missing 3/4 of a full season is held higher than 3/4 of a partial season? Personally I would put both lower in terms of overall seasons due to the missed time.
I usually check if there's any notable separation between the leading scorer and second highest scorer on the team.
2012-13 Penguins;
Crosby, 56 points in 36 games (1.56 points per game)
Kunitz, 52 points in 48 games (1.08 ppg)
1999-00 Penguins;
Jagr, 96 points in 63 games (1.52 ppg)
Kovalev, 66 points in 82 games (0.80 ppg)
For comparison, here's the 2000-01 Penguins with Lemieux included as well;
Jagr, 121 points in 81 games (1.49 ppg)
Kovalev, 95 points in 79 games (1.20 ppg)
Lemieux, 76 points in 43 games (1.77 ppg)