Again...then why did the team not come out at the start of the 2nd period with a high compete level?
Not buying it at all. The evidence contradicts the 'Eakins motivated the team with Ellers comments' premise.
Mandating that the effect
must be applied at a specific point of the period is just as fallacious.
For me it's not a point of science (since it can never be confirmed and the extra factor - the other team - can never be accounted for). It's a philosophical discussion and while it's perfectly valid to say "it can't be verified" it's also not something you can dismiss simply on the basis of lack of evidence. Dismiss it because you don't think it's a factor, but it's still philosophy.
The unfortunate problem is that human being do not have 100% control over their cognitive functions (even if they think they do). So while this may lead people to think that "hot streaks" are just reflections of a purely statistical aberration that makes a player look like they are overachieving in a particular game or over a sequence of games.
You're looking for evidence for something that has too many unknown variables (the human psyche) in a situation that you'll never be able to control the variables in order to substantiate your position either.
It's philosophy, not science. And it will possibly never be science.