16 - Hellebuyck
25 - Scheifele
46 - Laine
Good picks ? I think so.
From Main board..
25 - Scheifele
46 - Laine
Good picks ? I think so.
From Main board..
Last edited by a moderator:
Helly easy pick but leaving Ehlers off and including Laine is ridiculous.16 - Hellebuyck
25 - Scheifele
46 - Laine
Good picks ? I think so.
Disagree with some of the ordering, but not an unreasonable list. Would have liked to see Ehlers on the list, but a lot of what he adds isn't on the score sheet so these types of lists often miss those types of players.16 - Hellebuyck
25 - Scheifele
46 - Laine
Good picks ? I think so.
From Main board..
Their top 50 went like this:
1. Mackinnon
2. McDavid
3. Crosby
4. Panarin
5. Pastrnak
6. Draisatl
7. Hedman
8. Pettersson
9. Point
10. Kucherov
11. Marchand
12. Matthews
13. Eichel
14. Kane
15. Ovechkin
16. Hellebuyck
17. Vasilevsky
18. Malkin
19. Josi
20. Barkov
21. Seth Jones
22. O’Reilly
23. Carlson
24. Pietrangelo
25. Scheifele
26. Aho
27. Marner
28. Heiskanen
29. Stone
30. Barzal
31. Bergeron
32. Werenski
33. Rantanen
34. Huberdeau
35. Price
36. Couturier
37. Rask
38. P Luc-Dubois
39. Tavares
40. Lehner
41. Slavin
42. Connor
43. Theodore
44. Makar
45. Q Hughes
46. Laine
47. Horvat
48. Zibanejad
49. M Tkachuk
50. C Hart
the coach?So, the top rated goalie, a center and 2 wingers in the top-50.
Any doubt what separates us from true contention?
So, the top rated goalie, a center and 2 wingers in the top-50.
Any doubt what separates us from true contention?
Mostly offensive stats build these. None of our stars play defense.
So then wouldn't a novel concept be to build something around our strengths. We have players that can score, put in a system designed to optimize that shooting talent.
I would tend to agree, also I think if we can get one other line besides lowrys to play solid defence the entire aspect of this team will change.
People giving too much credit for Panarin's effect on his play, I imagine. Didnt Panarin play more with Strome anyways? Crazy thatZibanejad at 48? Lol what. Sorry I just had to point that out.
Swap Connor for Ehlers, but outside that I dont think it's too far off.
People giving too much credit for Panarin's effect on his play, I imagine. Didnt Panarin play more with Strome anyways? Crazy that