- Oct 3, 2013
- 37,282
- 10,838
70 millionSees Mudryk trending, well didn't expect it to be that.
70 millionSees Mudryk trending, well didn't expect it to be that.
That’s a very good point…But, has Joey Swoll roasted him?
He did.
Oh lol. I think I had the Mudryk clip in my head and thought you were replying to that, not the tweet here.I know, that was the joke. Garnacho hasn't been able to accomplish that.
Wait he didnt?I know, that was the joke. Garnacho hasn't been able to accomplish that.
Yeah, Tottenham is at 35M so 25M makes sense. But I still don't like the look25M seems reasonable enough given Newcastle making the CL and theoretically stepping into a higher tier.
Yeah, Tottenham is at 35M so 25M makes sense. But I still don't like the look
Yeah, but they can do funky things like pay it all at once or have weird bonuses or something that boost the revenue for a certain year to offset FFP.Oh for sure, it's not remotely independent and there's a 0% chance the deal gets made if Newcastle was bought by a random US billionaire instead of by the Saudi state, but at least they're not pumping fake money into the club like City was/is.
I don't think he was playing in any of the matches he bet on to lose though. I mean not that it makes it right, but it reduces the severity of it a little bit.Gambling addiction diagnosis got Toney reduced ban
Brentford striker Ivan Toney received a reduced ban from football because of a diagnosed gambling addiction.www.bbc.co.uk
Addiction or no, 8 months is insanely light for the stuff he was charged with. Guy was betting on his team to lose lol.
Typically, authorities come down pretty harshly on anything to do with betting irregularities by players. The fact that Toney bet on his own team to lose (true he wasn't playing, but he was definitely privy to team selection/inside information), bet on games he did participate in, and on top of that repeatedly lied to investigators, and got only 8 months, to me is astounding.I don't think he was playing in any of the matches he bet on to lose though. I mean not that it makes it right, but it reduces the severity of it a little bit.
Should be banned for life. Did this information come out after his punishment was dished out?Ivan Toney: Banned footballer bet on own team to lose, says FA
Brentford has promised to help Toney after the written reasons for his ban state the suspended forward has a gambling addiction.news.sky.com
He bet on his team to lose........what a guy
No excuses. Love the player, probably could've sold him to united for a ridiculous fee, which sucks, but 8 months for betting on your own team to lose? No punishment would be too harsh.Gambling addiction diagnosis got Toney reduced ban
Brentford striker Ivan Toney received a reduced ban from football because of a diagnosed gambling addiction.www.bbc.co.uk
Addiction or no, 8 months is insanely light for the stuff he was charged with. Guy was betting on his team to lose lol.
I agree that it sends an unfortunate message that the PL is pretty easy on gambling, which of course organized crime could see as an encouragement.Typically, authorities come down pretty harshly on anything to do with betting irregularities by players. The fact that Toney bet on his own team to lose (true he wasn't playing, but he was definitely privy to team selection/inside information), bet on games he did participate in, and on top of that repeatedly lied to investigators, and got only 8 months, to me is astounding.
Daniel Sturridge got four months for one case of passing information on an impending transfer.