FOr Brayden pointHabs are presenting an offer sheet tomorrow
People want to improve the team by replacing someone like Palat/Gourde, not necessarily just add money. Some people want a real change and not necessarily standing pat and hoping the young guys improve and make us better. It doesnt always work like that. Dotchin regressed big time. Serge didnt take a huge step forward. Not everyone thinks we have all the time in the world just to be patient.
For every kid we've had success developing, theres been a good trade/UFA signing. Coburn, Stralman, McD, Bishop, etc were all good signings. Who knows what's gonna work - it's all a crap shoot.
However, the one thing a lot of folks think we need is a good, gritty, top 6 leader (not a plug like Morrow or Kunitz).
The Blue Jackets say hiPalat I can see being moved down the lineup, which is where I move Cirelli up, but Gourde shouldn't. He took a little step back last year but the year prior he was just as good as Pavelski was. The last two postseasons he played 21 games he has 3g 5a 8p, 1g 4a 5p at ES. Pavelski played 23 games 6g 11a 17p, but ES 2g 6a 8p playing close to 4 more minutes a night. Is Pavelski really that much better?
Those UFA signings or trades worked out because we lacked depth back then. We had enough depth that we were able to trade Miller for futures. We don't have a real need for an impact player, not do we even have the money for one, we just need someone to challenge Ruuta for a spot.
Palat I can see being moved down the lineup, which is where I move Cirelli up, but Gourde shouldn't. He took a little step back last year but the year prior he was just as good as Pavelski was. The last two postseasons he played 21 games he has 3g 5a 8p, 1g 4a 5p at ES. Pavelski played 23 games 6g 11a 17p, but ES 2g 6a 8p playing close to 4 more minutes a night. Is Pavelski really that much better?
Those UFA signings or trades worked out because we lacked depth back then. We had enough depth that we were able to trade Miller for futures. We don't have a real need for an impact player, not do we even have the money for one, we just need someone to challenge Ruuta for a spot.
I'm not going to argue with that but Palat/Gourde have been demonstrable liabilities for 2 years in a row in the playoffs. WE need players in the top 6 that can play 82+ games, not just 50 or 60.
Do we take the 4 first round picks and then go pay pavelski? OR match the offer for point ?Would not be shocked.
Do we take the 4 first round picks and then go pay pavelski? OR match the offer for point ?
What a kick in the dick if Dallas signs both Pavs and Perry.
Yes, it's a too big salary for us right now.Not really, we can't offer the kind of cash they want. Pavs wants 3-4 years at $7 million AAV. No way, and I'm glad we walked away.
Yes, it's a too big salary for us right now.
We cannot match this offer, unfortunately.
But I really hope we'll be able to acquire a (good) veteran.
Yes, the big problem is moving Gourde and/or Palat.Not holding my breath unless Gourde and/or Palat are moved in the next few hours.
Yes, the big problem is moving Gourde and/or Palat.
And my prediction is...neither Palat nor Gourde will be traded in the next hours.
So we'll stand pat and maybe we'll add a Dman.
Drej?Sadly, I think you're right. Drej isn't right so if he looks bad early on or gets hurt again, it's an ominous development.