Whileee
Registered User
- May 29, 2010
- 46,075
- 33,132
perlini
Based on what I've seen at the U-18, I think Virtanen is a much better prospect. I would also take Fiala over Perlini.
perlini
I would look at trading down to #12 if we could translate it to a few more winz next season after we are eliminated from the playoff race.
I voted McCann.
If for no other reason than Sweech's brainwashing tactics worked so well on me with all his McCann propoganda posts this past year. That and I haven't seen Holden's list yet to sway me in another direction...
Fleury as my second choice.
Isn't the biggest minus on Virtanen, and why many think he has a high bust potential, that he uses his superior physical skills for an 18 year-old and isn't developing his game. He physically dominates the U18's with speed, and that negative is now a positive?
Doesn't add up for me.
Virtanen reminds me of Evander Kane.
Kane was a way better junior player, if you're making a comparison of them heading into their drafts. Kane played centre and wasn't a singularly focused net driver.
I don't know alot about Kane's JR career but a lot of the traits I hear about Virtanen I see in Kane.
- Shoots from anywhere (good and bad)
- Big, fast and physical
- Great shot
For those who like McCann, what have been your impressions based on his play in the U-18? I have to say that I've been unimpressed. I would prefer Fiala, and maybe Milano to McCann based on what I've seen.
Its funny that some people don't like Virtanen cause he's too similar to Kane, what's wrong with being compared to a 30 goal scorer? I think he's more a Getzlaf than Kane mold. He's going to be a good player.
I'm attempting to re-brainwash everyone into liking Kevin Fiala more.