2 2nd's, 1 conditional on ECF birth or re-signing w/ club, for Vermette.
Silly trade for Arizona. Those would be late 2nd round picks. Also team trading for Vermette probably lets him walk come free agency. Vermette wants to get paid.
That's the best offer I, as a GM, would feasibly give up for Vermette. That is what we gave up for Clowe.
Seems like an overpayment for a guy only slated to play 12 regular season games for a team.
Vermette is not Clowe. Clowe was shot before we traded for him.
That's not exactly right. He was playing pretty well until he got hurt again. And again.Clowe came here with a concussion history. He was downright horrible when we traded for him. Sharks bailed at the right time and we fell for it. The concussions were the end of him. Apart from that both are about to be FAs this situation is not comparable at all.
Clowe came here with a concussion history. He was downright horrible when we traded for him. Sharks bailed at the right time and we fell for it. The concussions were the end of him. Apart from that both are about to be FAs this situation is not comparable at all.
That's not exactly right. He was playing pretty well until he got hurt again. And again.
Noble idea but it didn't work out because of injuries.
He had 0 goals when we traded for him. Also had concussion history prior to coming here.
I stand corrected. There was talk he had as many as 4 concussions.
I fail to see how this guy is not the perfect example for a trade to Vermette. Just as valuable at the time he was traded as Vermette is atm.
Brooks wrote an article today saying that if the Rangers add 3.5 million to their cap, they'll have to subtract that amount, too.
He's usually pretty good w/ the cap. Did we get it wrong w/ the pro-rated estimates?
Can we just make a move now??? I don't c the point in waiting any longer the buyers and sells are pretty much set and that wat u guys have been saying would hold trades at the beginning of the year
The Rangers need a center who can win a damn face off. They want to be a team who controls the puck. Losing face offs is not a good start. Throughout a playoff series it will be exhausting having to chase consistently.
Hanzal is a longer term answer. He comes with some concerns, injuries are the main one, but he is a totally different type of player than what they have.
Vermette would fit this teams mold really well. Speed. Tenacity on the forecheck and he is a very good defensive center. The main issue I have with him is that he will cost quite a bit and is a pure rental. No way the Rangers can resign him.
They need a player to replace Glass as well. Everyone, 1-12 needs to be able to help carry the play. Especially in the playoffs.
Stempniak should be the 13th forward. Just okay. He is a good filler but not much else.
The Rangers need a center who can win a damn face off. They want to be a team who controls the puck. Losing face offs is not a good start. Throughout a playoff series it will be exhausting having to chase consistently.
Hanzal is a longer term answer. He comes with some concerns, injuries are the main one, but he is a totally different type of player than what they have.
Vermette would fit this teams mold really well. Speed. Tenacity on the forecheck and he is a very good defensive center. The main issue I have with him is that he will cost quite a bit and is a pure rental. No way the Rangers can resign him.
They need a player to replace Glass as well. Everyone, 1-12 needs to be able to help carry the play. Especially in the playoffs.
Stempniak should be the 13th forward. Just okay. He is a good filler but not much else.
No he shouldn't.
However ideally I'd like to see Hayes work on his faceoffs and become better at them.
Solid argument. I believe he should. He brings next to nothing outside of some puck possession which leads to next to nothing. He is decent all around not great at anything. He would be the ideal 13th forward when everyone is healthy.