1) Did anyone on the Flames have a noticeably bad Final? (Iginla, Craig Conroy and Martin Gelinas come to mind as known-name guys on the team, Rhett Warrener and maybe a young Derek Morris at this point too? I don't know if Phaneuf is in Calgary at this time).
I don't know if anyone had a bad final necessarily. Lecavalier had a surprising 3 points in those 7 games, no goals. He had that fight against Iginla that is memorable, so he was certainly involved. He had a weird postseason. Very streaky. No points in Round #1 vs. the Isles. Dominated against Montreal in Round 2. Played well in Round 3 vs. Philly. Then not very productive in the final. He only had 16 points all playoffs, it wasn't as if he lit the world on fire.
It was St. Louis and Richards that really did the damage, especially Richards. Still holds the record for 7 game winners in the playoffs. Had 26 points and did very well in the final. 3 points in that pivotal Game 6 and St. Louis got the overtime winner.
2. Did anyone on the Bolts have a GREAT final? (Khabibulin?....obviously I think Ruslan Fedotenko had two goals in game 7, Lecavalier or St. Louis tear it up? Did Andreychuk do well in his role/for his age?)
See above, this was all about Brad Richards that spring. I'd have told you for sure he is a future HHOFer at that point.
3. The final score in game 7 2-1 Bolts or 2-0?
2-1, with a lovely clutch save from Khabibulin at the end of the game. Jordan Leopold had a yawning cage in front of him.
4. Bryan Sutter coaching the Flames at this point?
Darryl. He left after the 2006 season. Then joined the Kings in 2011. Does anyone remember why Sutter had such a big gap between coaching in the NHL? I can't.
5. Other thoughts/opinions.
Yes, it was a great Cup final. If you remember, this was a time when hockey really needed a signature postseason to hang its hat on. We had been without a good one for a while. 2001 is one you can point to that had some good drama and storylines and two great teams facing off in the final but in all honesty the playoffs were going through a bit of a lull. 1994 was a legendary postseason and then the partial season lockout happened. 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 were all drags. Hockey that wasn't always exciting, talented teams losing when a no-talent grinding team would beat them, then the 4 sweeps in a row in the Cup final. 1999, let's not go there. 2000 was the wrong two teams in the final. 2002 was okay but not great and 2003 again didn't have a great final, despite 7 games.
So 2004 was a refreshing change. You expect exciting hockey with Tampa in there, but you didn't with Calgary. The truth is, the Flames were not a very talented team, but played like they were. They worked hard, they were fast and their games were not boring. That Canucks/Flames series is right up there with the other one in 1994. Even the Sharks/Flames series wasn't boring. Iginla was really leading the charge.
I honestly thought we would be hearing a lot from Tampa in the future. They were young, they had talent..............and then Brad Richards among others took WAY too much money and because of the cap they had to get rid of Khabibulin and in 2006 they just got fed to Ottawa in the first round. They weren't the same team.
Lastly, the controversy in Game 6 about the "goal" is not a controversy in my opinion. I don't think it was a goal. Replays have shown it isn't one. The overheard replay, which is the most reliable, did not show it went in. Very, very close, but no goal. Even if it were a goal, people act like it was a lock Calgary wins. This wasn't overtime, it was still the 3rd period.