silkyjohnson50
Registered User
- Jan 10, 2007
- 11,301
- 1,178
Yup a kid that goes #1 this year if he is eligible and has more talent than anybody in this draft.
Exactly. So I think it's pretty silly to hold that against him.
Yup a kid that goes #1 this year if he is eligible and has more talent than anybody in this draft.
We are building a nightmare transition team.
The Wings are on the Boston model people. They have elite wingers (or that is the position we hope is like that in the future) and what they have is horse two way center prospects.
Sheahan and Larkin have skill, but what they will allow is players to fly the zone, are incredible board guys and have positional sense that will drive other teams insane. We will see, but Larkin is a good pick and he fits the organizational thrust of speed. You don't worry about Sheahan or Larkin keeping pace with our wingers and that will be important finding centers that don't get stretched the same way most would with the aggressive pushes Nyquist, Tatar and Mantha are capable of, it is a little harder than most think even at the NHL level.
The Wings are on the Boston model people. They have elite wingers (or that is the position we hope is like that in the future) and what they have is horse two way center prospects.
Sheahan and Larkin have skill, but what they will allow is players to fly the zone, are incredible board guys and have positional sense that will drive other teams insane. We will see, but Larkin is a good pick and he fits the organizational thrust of speed. You don't worry about Sheahan or Larkin keeping pace with our wingers and that will be important finding centers that don't get stretched the same way most would with the aggressive pushes Nyquist, Tatar and Mantha are capable of, it is a little harder than most think even at the NHL level.
I'd have gone with Fabbri, if it were me, but Kenneth obviously wants bigger guys these days. As it is, second-line centre is this guy's ceiling, and that's a maybe.
That's my optimistic take. Realistically, yeah, looks like a bust.
Maybe it was a bad idea to hire a head amateur scout from the freaking Blue Jackets.
wish we took tuch..... but check again.This draft didn't have elite-level talent available after the top-6 and Tuch was what the Red Wings needed so they drafted him.gh:
Mackenzie and Button both had Fabbri ranked lower than Larkin. And the TSN panel was raving over Larkin, too...
The Wings are on the Boston model people. They have elite wingers (or that is the position we hope is like that in the future) and what they have is horse two way center prospects.
I have seen some Derek stepan comparisons. I think it's a safe pick, but I don't like players that go to U of M, they seem to never pan out
Yes, exactly. Thank you.
I'm glad there's a few of us that feel this way. It seems clear as day that's the plan. Depth and two-way players throughout the lineup. If the Wings stick to this plan, they are going to easily become one of the biggest pains in the ass in the entire conference for years.
They've got young scoring wingers, two-way centers, and a mix of puck movers and defensive defenders all under 25. This is the most optimistic about the Wings future I've been in years.
Alas, I'm still less optimistic about the coming year. But that's not what draft day is entirely about.
Based on what exactly? Because his scouting report sounds somewhat like Ferraro's? Do you have any idea how many players in the draft are described as "fast, gritty, two-way forwards?"I'd have gone with Fabbri, if it were me, but Kenneth obviously wants bigger guys these days. As it is, second-line centre is this guy's ceiling, and that's a maybe.
That's my optimistic take. Realistically, yeah, looks like a bust.
Maybe it was a bad idea to hire a head amateur scout from the freaking Blue Jackets.
You can't build the "Boston model" without an elite defense to make the first pass and an elite goaltender.
The consistent message has been that the Wings are really high on their defensive prospects. Blashill practically will not shut up about the topic.You can't build the "Boston model" without an elite defense to make the first pass and an elite goaltender.
What elite d-man was available at 15?
You can't build the "Boston model" without an elite defense to make the first pass and an elite goaltender.
The consistent message has been that the Wings are really high on their defensive prospects. Blashill practically will not shut up about the topic.
and Mrazek is a solid shot at a great NHL goalie.
Don't forget Glendening.
what do you mean with boston model?
i mean when benning was asked about the 'boston model' he said he doesn't know what that means.
That's pretty awesome, man. Must feel a little surreal.im so happy the Wings drafted Dylan he lives 2 miles away from me and went to my high school i actually babysat him when he was younger we always played hockey in his driveway great kid hes got a bright future ahead of him
That's my point, Boston didn't build their team in a vacuum, they built it with the foundations in place. They had very good defense and goaltending, and from there they built a capable two way forward squad.
Imo, Julians system helps the players. I'm really not all that impressed with Boston's D. Besides Chara and Siedenberg, they're average.
wish we took tuch..... but check again.