MXD
Original #4
- Oct 27, 2005
- 50,824
- 16,555
Question is and I don't want to derail this thread but would Montreal trade Roy to Quebec the same as they traded him to Colorado? Which team would have got Roy in that case?
remember that one
good by roy
if your management and home crowd craps on you like that you better show them
That damn trade cost the Red Wings a dynasty... little did they know as they ripped Roy that night.
It is no wonder Houle and Tremblay haven't had jobs in the NHL since they were let go by the Habs. No doubt Tremblay was the worst coach in Habs history. And to think, the guys they let go prior to these two were Serge Savard (GM) and Jacques Demers (coach), two proven winners. Ouch.
.
Savard had a brutal recent history as a GM though.
What were the bad trades that led up to Savard getting fired that you think? He got Damphousse the year before they won the Cup in 1993. The Chelios trade in 1990 was not a smart one but I don't think he was justified in being fired in 1995.
I'll let someone else answer this one. I know that at the time there was a long list of good players he had traded away for poor value, guys like Lumme, Carbonneau, Svoboda, Lemieux. And the Savard trade stung for years. And although they got probably the best player in the Recchi deal, LeClair and Desjardins were both more or less as good as Recchi so that was a 2-for-1 deal too.
I'm sure there are more and better examples but a jaded habs fan can fill in the blanks for us.
My question isn't who would Roy have been traded to if the Nordiques hadn't moved, it's who would the Nordiques have traded for instead? Surely they were still in the market for a goalie; does anybody remember if any other teams were actively shopping a goaltender at the time?
I'll let someone else answer this one. I know that at the time there was a long list of good players he had traded away for poor value, guys like Lumme, Carbonneau, Svoboda, Lemieux. And the Savard trade stung for years. And although they got probably the best player in the Recchi deal, LeClair and Desjardins were both more or less as good as Recchi so that was a 2-for-1 deal too.
I'm sure there are more and better examples but a jaded habs fan can fill in the blanks for us.
I'll let someone else answer this one. I know that at the time there was a long list of good players he had traded away for poor value, guys like Lumme, Carbonneau, Svoboda, Lemieux. And the Savard trade stung for years. And although they got probably the best player in the Recchi deal, LeClair and Desjardins were both more or less as good as Recchi so that was a 2-for-1 deal too.
I'm sure there are more and better examples but a jaded habs fan can fill in the blanks for us.
Trading Kirk Muller and Schneider to Islanders for Malakhov and Turgeon was what ultimately sealed their fate. Not that it was a bad trade (I think it was a good trade) but it wasn't liked.
That's a good question too. CuJo was traded that season, but that was before the year, so I suppose if they didn't do it before the season in real life, it wouldn't have happened anyways. Though, it would be interesting to see how things played out if he was though. With playoff success behind Colorado, Joseph would definitely be seen in another light. Though, if they didn't end up winning a cup it would have further sealed the idea that he wasn't a winner (and would have affected the views of Sakic and Forsberg as well).
Other than that, there doesn't look like too many options that season. They could have made a play for Ranford, who ended up being decent down the stretch for Boston, but they probably wouldn't have been able to win a cup with him. Or they may have played out the year with Fiset, and again, probably not have won the cup.
If that was the case, they may have gone after a goalie in the coming seasons. Belfour was traded the next year, and then signed as a free agent, and Joseph and Vanbiesbrouck were free agents in '98. Or they could have tried their luck with Thibault, who was a serviceable, if not championship caliber goalie. You would think they would have spent big money to get an elite guy, though at the same time, you wonder if their finances would have been the same. Colorado was always selling out, but part of that was because they were an elite team right from the start. If that wasn't the case, perhaps things would have been different.
It is no wonder Houle and Tremblay haven't had jobs in the NHL since they were let go by the Habs. No doubt Tremblay was the worst coach in Habs history. And to think, the guys they let go prior to these two were Serge Savard (GM) and Jacques Demers (coach), two proven winners. Ouch.
15 years ago Montreal lost the last superstar they have ever had. Yes Theodore had that one freak year, but when your best players of the last 15 years are Saku Koivu, an old Kovalev and Mike Cammalleri you know you are doing something wrong. To tell you the truth, Montreal is only now starting to recover from that horrible trade.