- May 25, 2014
- 46,161
- 31,704
He's like a chlorofluorocarbon.
Thats what Ive been saying for SO long now
He's like a chlorofluorocarbon.
you weren't far off actually.I shall wait patiently for Murray's fluke speech.
you weren't far off actually.
This is plain ridiculous and wow is he becoming unlikeable
That you think they were going to trade Gudbranson right now is hilarious. It is not happening this early in the season. I do not know extent of injury but if Tanev is ready and the injury is relatively minor it is better for the Canucks right now as they will win more with Guddy out.An injury around the time a trade could realistically be expected is never good timing. That you think so is hilarious.
you weren't far off actually.
This is plain ridiculous and wow is he becoming unlikeable
That you think they were going to trade Gudbranson right now is hilarious. It is not happening this early in the season. I do not know extent of injury but if Tanev is ready and the injury is relatively minor it is better for the Canucks right now as they will win more with Guddy out.
Only if we hadn't given away Forsling for an AHL player, this team could actually be a legit playoff contender.
Agree but he would be inlikely to sit Gudbranson and make him more difficult to trade. Injury is convenient lets team put best lineup on ice.While I'd normally be inclined to agree about a trade early in the year, the Canucks were/are staring down the barrel of some interesting decisions on defense. I think it's pretty clear Green has liked Pouliot back there, and he's also a Biega fan. Hard to see him wanting to lose either of them, and his minute distribution to Gudbranson this season doesn't scream that Guddy is one of his favourites either.
He's getting better, I think he's been reading this board and picking up some pointers.
What's wrong with having both? Weird deflection attemptWhat is the difference between Forsling and Pouliot? Forsling is younger so likely is worth more now but night to night having Forsling vs Pouliot would mean nothing in the standings.
best part of it all, Canuck's aren't even in their final form. They're missing Tanev who changes the entire complex of our defence.
I didn't even watch the game and can tell this isn't trueof course having Forsling would be better than nothing but it would mean very little in the standing. Where do you think Forsling would be on our depth chart? Around Stecher better? You missed a good game Pouliot scoring on pp while being matched up vs Sidbey evenstrength. Poster bringing up Forsling in first place was deflection.
As in, we move Forsling for someone who can actually play RHD at an NHL level (not Clendening, not Gudbranson) and hell, maybe the Guds mistake doesn't even happen and McCann is either good depth or another piece. Because of the Forsling mistake we ended up losing two blue chippers for nothing, who could be helping the team be a little better with either better-fitting pieces or providing quality depth.of course having Forsling would be better than nothing but it would mean very little in the standing. Where do you think Forsling would be on our depth chart? Around Stecher better? You missed a good game Pouliot scoring on pp while being matched up vs Sidbey evenstrength. Poster bringing up Forsling in first place was deflection.
I am bias to others who watched the game was Edler and Pouliot matched against before Gudbranson injury at end of second? Did Pouliot score on pp? Think they show game replays if in doubt.I didn't even watch the game and can tell this isn't true
As in, we move Forsling for someone who can actually play RHD at an NHL level (not Clendening, not Gudbranson) and hell, maybe the Guds mistake doesn't even happen and McCann is either good depth or another piece. Because of the Forsling mistake we ended up losing two blue chippers for nothing, who could be helping the team be a little better with either better-fitting pieces or providing quality depth.
Sure, I'm just *****ing way after the fact but it's hard to not lament a trade gone horribly wrong given the tight margins in the playoffs race and our ability to best good teams. But this team isn't good enough to play at a Top 15 level most nights.
of course having Forsling would be better than nothing but it would mean very little in the standing. Where do you think Forsling would be on our depth chart? Around Stecher better? You missed a good game Pouliot scoring on pp while being matched up vs Sidbey evenstrength. Poster bringing up Forsling in first place was deflection.
okay I respect that you want team to make playoffs, I just thin
k you can not blame hypothetical playoff miss on obvious mistake but relatively minor move. It was a bad move it was like we found money with 5th round pick then gave it away. However I imagine if the Pens do not win the cup they will not be blaming the trade of Pouliot. I definitively do not think they will be lementing this trade after a regular season that they won convincingly in the game thread.