steveg
Registered User
Does anyone else think that Scuderi and Hatesad are going to hurt the offense as much or more than the defense? One of those two albatrosses (albatri?) will be on the ice for at least half the game. If they're trying to go all in on offense, the forgot to go all in.
Absolutely. (Hatesad, LOL!)
I totally agree with this. Especially Scuds...as bad as he was defensively last year, his detrimental effect on our transition/offense was probably even WORSE, IMO. It's not to be underestimated the degree to which he neuters an offensive attack. I just can't see why nothing is being done about this. You KNOW the coaches have to see this...every quote I see from MJ about his system talks about how they need fast puck movement from their D in transition, and effective pinching at appropriate times when in the O-zone...things that Scuds is TERRIBLE at, and whose pathetic lack of speed amplifies these shortcomings even further. And yet, they play him. And then, not ONLY do they play him, but they put him on the ice behind their top offensive lines...
This has to be the most mind-bending, illogical, head-shaking thing this team continues to do (along with treating Kunitz as an indispensable, top-line forward).
I know I've said this a million times, I just don't know how Scuds -- in the eyes of the coaches -- does ANYTHING better than what Clendening showed in the pre-season. Was Clendening the second coming of Bobby Orr? Of COURSE not, but he was at least competent defensively, and was actually GOOD in transition -- his passing, in particular...
In any case, I can't wait to see this team in action. Despite a few BIG negatives, there are a lot of positives here, as well. Should be interesting. LGP!