arby18
Registered User
- Jun 12, 2010
- 481
- 2
No, it's not concerning one bit.
Oh. My mistake. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Last edited:
No, it's not concerning one bit.
Oh. My mistake. Thanks for clearing that up for me. *rolls eyes*
It's like this...
Mid-round picks are very overrated.
Why bother drafting outside of the 3rd round then? Trade all those picks for assets if that's the case and stop trying to build through the draft.
Why bother drafting outside of the 3rd round then? Trade all those picks for assets if that's the case and stop trying to build through the draft.
A team of player evaluators who have watched his every move for the last two years decided that this 4th round pick from two years ago wasn't going to contribute to the success of the organization so they decided not to invest their resources in him. This happens with every freaking team every freaking year.
Zach Yuen and this story is of such little importance in the grand scheme of the organization that this thread and all the whining herein is beyond laughable.
Differences of opinions are all fine and dandy. Let's just hope Chevy's opinion is a good one.Well because once in awhile you get a good prospect like Lowry or later. Just because we haven't picked multiple guys in the later rounds that are looking very good doesn't mean we won't still find guys.
Also, just because some other guys think the kid has good potential doesn't mean Chevy does. It's a difference of opinion. It's still pretty early in Chevy's drafting reign in Winnipeg.
I love it when people who dare to have the audacity to question our beloved general manager and his staff are called whiners. How dare anyone question such great leadership who dine on the waiver wire? Maybe that should be how they label their team building instead of "building through the draft"...
Out of curiousity, how many of those teams traded up to get the guy who they later let go? And how many of those teams we're much much much closer to the 50-contract limit then the Jets currently are?
A team of player evaluators who have watched his every move for the last two years decided that this 4th round pick from two years ago wasn't going to contribute to the success of the organization so they decided not to invest their resources in him. This happens with every freaking team every freaking year.
Zach Yuen and this story is of such little importance in the grand scheme of the organization that this thread and all the whining herein is beyond laughable.
I hope you get some sleep tonight knowing somebody else out there is going to take Zach Yuen in the fifth or sixth round so they can waste money and resources trying to develop in the AHL for a couple of years and then see him bounce around the ECHL or European leagues until he's 30. I'll sleep fine.
As a former Isles fan, this situation reminds me so much of this equally meaningless event: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=384985
As Truck said already, GMs get rid of prospects all the time, which is mostly when either a) they are close to 50 limit or b) they prospect has no value to the organization.
Obviously Chevy doesn't think Yuen has any value any more.
Meh. I disagree but meh.
IMO I don't agree in it being wise but that's just an opinion.
It's not because I thought of Yuen as a world beater or anything, as he's tiers and tiers away from a Trouba or the likes.
Just because a combo of:
* we're no where near 50
* any newly drafted guys won't be pushing that limit up anytime soon
* Yuen is better than other LHD in our system at the same point in developmental timeline, depending on your view on Melchiori vs Yuen
* even a player who doesn't reach the NHL but helps the farm team is an asset, and our farm needs lots of help
* it's extremely low risk to sign an ELC with average costs a year being about the same as 1 NHL game of Olli Jokinen and no hit to the cap
* most third party scouts think he still has made solid strides and low risk guy, and I agree from my 30-odd viewings of him this season (for the AIH prospect tracker)
But -- again --, if Chevy doesn't think Yuen is even good enough to help out the AHL team, then Yuen isn't worth it. While I disagree and think Yuen is worth it, he was still an incredibly small cog in a much larger machine. Not whining at all, just differences in opinions.
It's a 4th round pick. Not every pick works out. Get that in your head first. You can call it bad asset management all you want, but a couple of mid round picks that don't work out is nothing to cry about.
That is exactly how organizations continually waste draft picks and are devoid of depth while others that consistently draft in lower positions have good organizational depth with success at all levels.
I'm not saying that SPECIFICALLY it was the wrong choice not to sign Yuen (keeping in mind that we still don't know WHY he wasn't signed). What I am saying is your above statement is terribly flawed.
If you continually keep discounting and pissing away your lower round picks you are robbing yourself of crucial organizational depth. Many, MANY great and very useful NHL'ers have been developed at these draft positions. Again, look at the Red Wings if you want proof.
A team of player evaluators who have watched his every move for the last two years decided that this 4th round pick from two years ago wasn't going to contribute to the success of the organization so they decided not to invest their resources in him. This happens with every freaking team every freaking year.
Zach Yuen and this story is of such little importance in the grand scheme of the organization that this thread and all the whining herein is beyond laughable.
We do now. Chevy said Yuen didn't progress with expectations.
Haha ah, when did that happen? Sorry, I've been pretty busy the past few days.
In that case, I guess you have to give the org. the benefit of the doubt. I still don't personally agree with that choice considering where we are with contracts but maybe they have seen something critically flawed with Yuen's game that will prevent him from ever being an NHL player.
We tend to get super excited with players in Junior here on HF. Players that will never ever be good enough to play in the NHL. Look at the way we squawk about Lowry? (not saying Lowry won't be good or great, just saying its WAY too early to be plugging him into an NHL lineup)
PS even with this revelation from Chevy it doesn't change the spirit of my post to Duke wrt the way a team develops it's draft picks.
Oh no I agree with you.
He did it on a radio interview (according to PS21)
I don't know if I trust that PS21
Oh no I agree with you.
He did it on a radio interview (according to PS21)
EDIT: (not wanting to spam by making new post)
hahaha I know... PS21 is a bit untrustworthy
Since 1999, Matthew Lombardi is the only 4th round or later draft pick to go unsigned and still have a career in the NHL.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2010/6/3/1498138/getting-drafted-for-a-second-time
Not sure I agree with the decision, especially in light of having traded up to draft him, but it's a decision that will likely amount to nothing.
That is exactly how organizations continually waste draft picks and are devoid of depth while others that consistently draft in lower positions have good organizational depth with success at all levels.
I'm not saying that SPECIFICALLY it was the wrong choice not to sign Yuen (keeping in mind that we still don't know WHY he wasn't signed). What I am saying is your above statement is terribly flawed.
If you continually keep discounting and pissing away your lower round picks you are robbing yourself of crucial organizational depth. Many, MANY great and very useful NHL'ers have been developed at these draft positions. Again, look at the Red Wings if you want proof.