Fenian24
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2010
- 10,354
- 13,427
I think Kaliyev falls into the character discussion as well. Regardless of size, skill level, toughness, how great a fighter, shooting ability, great physical play, however you grade players out I want nothing to do with players with questionable work ethic or desire to play. See Spooner, Hamilton, or tons of players who had the talent but no work ethic or desire.I like all those things too. Not a super fan of the smaller players, though they can't be ignored. You have to have a healthy balance. You need some sand paper in there as well. You need guys like Pastarnak but they can't all be like that. The Bruins as they are built right now are a little lacking in the snarl department.
Truth is, I went in hoping to get Beecher but when I saw Kaliyev fall that far down I changed my mind. I am a fan of the bigger players, guys like Beecher are my kind of hockey player. Kaliyev isn't small either and has skill to burn. The knock on him, and probably why he fell is he's know to drag his feet at times but his skill level is rare.
Even when the Bruins drafted Senyshyn, I reluctantly drank the Kool-Aid cause I'm all about about big , fast , skilled players but 4 years later I see him struggle and all those chosen after him producing. I need a few answers, I'm not getting any that make a lick of sense to me.
That may not be Kaliyev but usually when a player with his skillset drops it's interviews or intangibles. Beecher seems to be the opposite regarding poor intangibles