idk but it's funny that everyone coming in is saying AINEC for either guy
Ya the 40 % voting for Hyman is Hilarious considering 90% of that 40% are Leaf fans. Take away the Leaf vote and it would 90% to 10% for Anderson. Now that's too funny.
And Anderson has only one goal less in three less games with less PP time than Tavares... what's your point?Spezza has more points than Anderson does this season.
So he also has less goals and points than Tavares as well as having less points than a 4th line jason spezza. I agree, not a good look.And Anderson has only one goal less in three less games with less PP time than Tavares... what's your point?
11 million $ for pajama boy and he only has 1 more goal with 3 more games played, more pp time and more ice time per game playing on an offensively loaded team... Agreed. Not a good look on Tavares.So he also has less goals and points than Tavares as well as having less points than a 4th line jason spezza. I agree, not a good look.
11 million $ for pajama boy and he only has 1 more goal with 3 more games played, more pp time and more ice time per game playing on an offensively loaded team... Agreed. Not a good look on Tavares.
An now reverse the roles. Put Anderson on the Leafs and Hyman on the Habs. Game, set, match in favor of Anderson.
Tavares has more points than anyone on your roster... really not a good look on tavares
You have a 10.5 million dollar goalie with a .901 save % so i dont think you should be throwing stones from your glass house.11 million $ for pajama boy and he only has 1 more goal with 3 more games played, more pp time and more ice time per game playing on an offensively loaded team... Agreed. Not a good look on Tavares.
An now reverse the roles. Put Anderson on the Leafs and Hyman on the Habs. Game, set, match in favor of Anderson.
At 10.5, Price totally sucks and I have no problems admitting that. That's why my tag line is Mr. Objectivity. Something lacking on these boards.You have a 10.5 million dollar goalie with a .901 save % so i dont think you should be throwing stones from your glass house.
Then you should know, objectively, that JT is a good player regardless of his current cost. I do have a feeling that you, like me, are mostly just taking the piss but this is a Hyman V Anderson thread anyways so maybe we should get back into that.At 10.5, Price totally sucks and I have no problems admitting that. That's why my tag line is Mr. Objectivity. Something lacking on these boards.
Of course Tavares is still a good player and I like him because he's won me a couple fantasy pools.Then you should know, objectively, that JT is a good player regardless of his current cost. I do have a feeling that you, like me, are mostly just taking the piss but this is a Hyman V Anderson thread anyways so maybe we should get back into that.
Needless to say, it's Josh Anderson hands down.
Hyman is feisty, gutsy, play hard and play with heart, and I would take him on the Habs too, but Anderson is all that, bigger, tougher, faster and equipped with a lethal wrist shot.
Only downside is the terrible contract but so far so good.
Dude's a f***ing beast. I think he put the nail into the coffin of this thread last night[/QUOTE]
That's not how it works.
What if Hyman scores a hat trick in game 2. While Anderson is a -3?
Needless to say, it's Josh Anderson hands down.
Hyman is feisty, gutsy, play hard and play with heart, and I would take him on the Habs too, but Anderson is all that, bigger, tougher, faster and equipped with a lethal wrist shot.
Only downside is the terrible contract but so far so good.
Dude's a f***ing beast. I think he put the nail into the coffin of this thread last night
What if Hyman scores a hat trick in game 2. While Anderson is a -3?
Will you be saying the same thing?
lol at someone saying Anderson has great vision and iq.