Apparently LA is comfortable retaining 20-25% on Kovy, the natural deal, I think is there, a 2nd round pick and Ho Sang for Kovy at 20-25% retention.
Value of: Your Sniper Winger to NYI
- Thread starter impaaaaaact
- Start date
Apparently LA is comfortable retaining 20-25% on Kovy, the natural deal, I think is there, a 2nd round pick and Ho Sang for Kovy at 20-25% retention.
impaaaaaact
Registered User
To be fair, that's what they said at the beginning of the year. We're in first in the division with 10 days until the trade deadline. Bellows at this point is probably seen by other teams as our 5th most valuable prospect (I actually have him behind Iskhakov and Koivula now, but that's besides the point). While there's no way I'm trading a first AND Bellows for Nyquist, I think it's pretty realistic that Bellows is available
PWJunior
Stay safe!
Instead of retaining on Kovalchuk, how about taking Hickey's contract in addition to Ho-Sang?
Probably not....I don't see Hickey fitting in to what LA needs to do or is doing
The Winter Soldier
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2011
- 70,803
- 21,006
I think Lou would make that deal. I know I would. Hosang and 25% retention for Kovy.
Kingspiracy
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2006
- 6,320
- 2,416
PWJunior
Stay safe!
Free up a contract and roster spot. With Toews' emergence and a trio of young LHD in Bridgeport, Hickey is unneeded.
Last edited:
periferal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2007
- 28,628
- 16,014
Better yet...How about you put Ladd in the trade, and the Isles retain salary on his deal?
BelovedIsles
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2005
- 20,136
- 5,421
BelovedIsles
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2005
- 20,136
- 5,421
Blue chippers don’t go the other way for rentals. Signed, different story.
Because then he couldn’t crack their ridiculous defensive depth then but now he’s a weak 4 or a strong 5
KingsFan7824
Registered User
Because it's cheaper for the Kings to retain even 50% in a trade on Kovalchuk for 2 years than taking Hickey at 100% for 3? Having to wait another entire season to get out from Hickey, might as well just keep Kovalchuk, if all that's coming back is RFA Ho-Sang.
CREW99AW
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2002
- 40,928
- 3,389
Kovalchuk has 2 yrs/ $6.5m per caphit, left on deal.
Ladd has 5 yrs/ $5.5m per caphit,remaining on his deal .
I cannot see why team would touch the term on tbe Ladd deal.
I am keeping my fingers crossed that Staple is right,that we get buyouts in the new cba
CREW99AW
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2002
- 40,928
- 3,389
3 way, avoids the rivalry thing:
not 111% final, just a framework:
something around core of:
Hoffman to Islanders
Georgiev to Panthers
Dobson + cap dump from FL Reimer* to Rangers
* Isles have enuf cap space to absorb Hof
per one of the links [I think Yardbarker] in a FL trade primer, Reimer has played reasonably well, but they would rather move him and create cap
this deal does that, and with Shesty coming in once he is here we flip Reimer to a team needing netminder.
not 111% final, just a framework:
something around core of:
Hoffman to Islanders
Georgiev to Panthers
Dobson + cap dump from FL Reimer* to Rangers
* Isles have enuf cap space to absorb Hof
per one of the links [I think Yardbarker] in a FL trade primer, Reimer has played reasonably well, but they would rather move him and create cap
this deal does that, and with Shesty coming in once he is here we flip Reimer to a team needing netminder.
Thrasymachus
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2018
- 5,214
- 6,714
impaaaaaact
Registered User
Don't distract CREW99AW, he's currently compiling a long list of players who were on pace for 66 points that were traded for a 2nd.
Plus he figures Panarin is coming to the Islanders for a 1st and Bellows.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
GDT: Around the League 2023-24: The Marathon Becomes A Sprint- Latest: Captain Fantastic
