ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,937
- 6,021
This tells me you know nothing about Weber's contract.Who in their right mind would want Weber and his contract? Unless you are retaining a significant amount.
This tells me you know nothing about Weber's contract.Who in their right mind would want Weber and his contract? Unless you are retaining a significant amount.
Dermott is a cost controlled 21 year old, petry is 30 years old with some years left on his contract.
No team should be giving away young dman with good to great potential for dman like petry(who i like and would want on the leafs).
Also comparing jordie benn to dermott is very disingenuous. He has struggled to be a good nhl dman for a long time. Just cause Hes had a good 9 game sample doesnt undo the last 6 years. Compare that to Dermott who has looked good at every level of competition hes played, its just silly.
Funny enough, TOI isn't really a measure of if a D-man is good or not.
And Maatta was 5th in TOI/GP in 15/16 and 3rd in TOI/GP in 16/17 on the Pens runs. Behind such great D-men like Hainsey and Daley.
You think Maatta is a good young D-man. I'm not a fan. Enjoy him on the Pens.
IMO no team is going to pay out the nose for a guy who is over 30 like that. Now if he was 28 then it would make a difference to most GM's but the fact that he will be 31 in a month means his best years are behind him.
No team will move a top prospect D + 1st + for him. If that is the type of return expected he will sit like Tanev has in Vancouver.
Especially considering that the Habs only moved a 2nd and 5th for him originally. We'll see what others have to say.
petry would instantly be a top 2 in TO and form an excellent duo on PP with reillyHe's the Leafs top prospect and most certainly not a B prospect. He's in the AHL at 18 and impressed Leaf management in training camp.
Either way, like I said, you guys only paid a 2nd for him to get him. Much older now he will not return 2-3 times that price in trade.
It is if you're trusted with and succeed in those minutes on a team that won the Cup.
But he's not your thing, which I can understand because of his footspeed in a league that's all about speed right now. That's why I want the Pens to part with him, in spite of his proven contributions to a Cup winner, solid production, and good underlying numbers. I'm not sure what exactly Habs fans are expecting here...Sergachev calibre? Because that's not going to happen.
petry would instantly be a top 2 in TO and form an excellent duo on PP with reilly
petry would instantly be a top 2 in TO and form an excellent duo on PP with reilly
[/QUOTE]So keep Dermott. He's excellent on the 3rd pair and has strong potential to be good moving up. He could be really good. But I don't see why any team should trade the better player now with term + for a player that could be as good as Petry is now but could not. Montreal doesn't need the space. They can afford to be patient.
Jordie Benn has had excellent underlying numbers for most of his career barring 2017-2018 (when he played to high in the line-up). The only reason I brought up Benn was to point out that being a good bottom pair D-man doesn't mean you're going to do more. There are plenty of other names I can use too if it makes you feel better.
Leafs only use 1 D on the PP
Because they have absolutely no one else worthy on the right side to play on the PP
Learn about how front loaded Weber's contract is and then try that post againWho in their right mind would want Weber and his contract? Unless you are retaining a significant amount.
To mtl
Seks
Lagesson
To edm
Petry
You asked for a young lhd and lagesson is one and to make cap work seks has to go the other way or Russel and you’d have to retain on petry if Russel is the one we are trading to make cap work
If they are retaining, PIT is adding something else.Maatta for Petry with 1.5 mil per retained to balance out the cap.
I think the Habs target someone younger tbhHow about a resigned Gardiner and a 2nd or 3rd for Petry?
I think the Habs target someone younger tbh