2forsbergaura1 said:
more room to defend, but also much more room to ATTACK. Pierre may be a pain, but he is totally RIGHT. removing the redline gets rid of those 2-line pass calls and opens up the ice big time!
The trap is a European system built to combat the home-run pass. One spawned the other. The RSL has no two-line pass rule and is a very defensive league.
It seems like it would open up the game, but in regular league play, it seems to do the opposite.
From an E.J. Hradek article that should be required reading everytime this subject comes up:
'If you're one of those fans who'd like to see the NHL remove the red line, you might want to think twice. The Finnish Elite League, which has played without the red line for several seasons, plans to restore the center stripe next season. The league feels the game has become a series of misguided long passes, which, combined with the automatic icing rule, lead to an inordinate number of stoppages for icing. Finnish officials would like to restore the red line in all levels of hockey throughout the country. However, they are prohibited from doing so by IIHF rules. The Finns say that playing without the red line has made if difficult to develop young defensemen. They say that kids have become less interested in playing the position because they aren't as involved in the offense. With no red line, defenders are asked to make long passes. And because of the threat of a hanging forward behind them, they can't pinch and attack from the point. Rather, they must circle in the neutral zone to defend against the long breakout pass. That just isn't any fun. These days, Finnish kids are more interested in becoming goalies. Why? They think the masks are cool."
http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/columns/story?columnist=hradek_ej&id=1700394
Is that the end-all be-all of the discussion? Definitely not. But is it something to think about when considering the change? Absolutely.
Thanks to my pal norske for finding the article.