Lower than what? We don't know what he's asking for. Unless he and/or his agent are nuts, it's really just the 1-way that matters. The salary attached to it shouldn't be much of a sticking point for their side.A 2-way deal only pays less if he doesn't make the team and goes to the AHL. If he wants a 1-way deal, he'll need to take a lower amount at the NHL level.
Might be, but they didn't really have another league they were willing to go to either. Plus keep in mind there is zero clue what the AHL will be doing this season.Looking back at the most recent RFA deals guys who hadn’t cemented a spot in the NHL were Watson, Sissons, and Gaudreau. All those guys signed deals that started off with one year with a two way contract followed by 1-2 years with a one way. Wonder if Trenin is getting a similar offer?
Yeah, if Poile is going to approach the Trenin dossier like he has all those other guys, then he's suffering from dementia, basically. He's not usually so "old school" or close-minded in some other areas. I tend to think of him as a fairly progressive hockey person, especially given his age and longevity in the league. But if he stubbornly clings to a dogmatic formula here, he's just hurting himself. He shouldn't have very much slack left in his job... hurting the team and himself is something he might want to think about. Trenin should just go ahead and get on the ice with SKA, I'm thinking. I wouldn't take any more BS from the Preds in his position.Might be, but they didn't really have another league they were willing to go to either. Plus keep in mind there is zero clue what the AHL will be doing this season.
I'm guessing the only reason he hasn't that once he does he is locked in until the KHL season is over. I think he'd rather be in the NHL but he isn't just going to accept anything.Yeah, if Poile is going to approach the Trenin dossier like he has all those other guys, then he's suffering from dementia, basically. He's not usually so "old school" or close-minded in some other areas. I tend to think of him as a fairly progressive hockey person, especially given his age and longevity in the league. But if he stubbornly clings to a dogmatic formula here, he's just hurting himself. He shouldn't have very much slack left in his job... hurting the team and himself is something he might want to think about. Trenin should just go ahead and get on the ice with SKA, I'm thinking. I wouldn't take any more BS from the Preds in his position.
The treated badly thing goes back to memories of what we were hearing out of Milwaukee fans. Essentially the coach barely played him, despite the fact he was better than players he was sitting for. When he did get to play it was often commented that he was misused. If I'm remembering correctly most of them were pretty shocked he didn't bail then.
Fast forward to this year and he finally got a chance, and frankly looked better than the guys he was sitting for. I suspect Hynes choice on players mainly erred on the side of playoff experience. We saw how that went.
I'm gonna guess Trenin wants two things, money and an assurance of playing time. The million dollar question is what can he make in Russia vs here and what kind of playing time can he get.
The other may be his initial feelings about Hynes, and based on the playoffs that leaves me concerned.
watson jarnkrok and sissons probably have a lot to do with that. poile has found a way to even screw up the bottom 6.So according to his agent, Poile hasn’t even offered Trenin a one-way deal.
None of those contracts keeps Poile from offering Trenin one. He could easily take Smith's spot or push Watson to the bench. Not to mention any of the 3 could be moved fairly easily.watson jarnkrok and sissons probably have a lot to do with that. poile has found a way to even screw up the bottom 6.
poile may still see the bottom 6 as pretty "full". he signed jarnkrok and sissons to 7 year deals. watson just extended this past year. throw in bonino and Grimaldi. poile may not see trenin as this lock to make the roster like us.None of those contracts keeps Poile from offering Trenin one. He could easily take Smith's spot or push Watson to the bench. Not to mention any of the 3 could be moved fairly easily.
Even if you sign Trenin you still need those guys, besides its not like Watson is making enough that using him as an extra man is going to kill you. Id say its more likely he is waiting on something or waiting on more clarity about what is coming up.poile may still see the bottom 6 as pretty "full". he signed jarnkrok and sissons to 7 year deals. watson just extended this past year. throw in bonino and Grimaldi. poile may not see trenin as this lock to make the roster like us.
he's obviously gambling if he hasn't even offered trenin a contract. All the while, trenin is over in Russia flirting with SKA.
I just don't see the point in offering a 2-way contract, though. If for some reason Trenin didn't make our team, 30 other NHL teams aren't dumb enough to pass him up on assignment waivers. There's no way he's getting through to Milwaukee, regardless.poile may still see the bottom 6 as pretty "full". he signed jarnkrok and sissons to 7 year deals. watson just extended this past year. throw in bonino and Grimaldi. poile may not see trenin as this lock to make the roster like us.
he's obviously gambling if he hasn't even offered trenin a contract. All the while, trenin is over in Russia flirting with SKA.
With the Radulov situation in the back of his mind I think Poile is being cautious. And will be even moreso now. Especially with a oneway contract. He has 6 contracts available and at a minimum will need to use 5 of them. While it should be a no brainer to give the kid a shot due to Cap issues the slots needed to be filled are on the 2nd line, and defense. I can not see Slotting two ELC's to the 2nd line and do not see any of the bottom 9 capable of moving up. One of the young guys will get a shot and the posturing a move to the KHL will only give Poile more cause to wait.poile may still see the bottom 6 as pretty "full". he signed jarnkrok and sissons to 7 year deals. watson just extended this past year. throw in bonino and Grimaldi. poile may not see trenin as this lock to make the roster like us.
he's obviously gambling if he hasn't even offered trenin a contract. All the while, trenin is over in Russia flirting with SKA.
I certainly hope you are right. That said, if we were to lose Trenin than I would be extremely dissatisfied with Poile's decision making.We're basically hearing one side of the story being fed from an agent that is willing to leverage jumping ship to the KHL as a bargaining chip. Even if you don't think Poile deserves the benefit of the doubt, this isn't enough to start jumping to conclusions with. Based on the direction the roster is going in for next season, you have to figure Trenin fits into the plan and a deal will get done.
The one side we are hearing though is disconcerting... and entirely credible... that Poile would push for a 2-way deal for Trenin is something I really don't have any trouble believing --- and being mad about.We're basically hearing one side of the story being fed from an agent that is willing to leverage jumping ship to the KHL as a bargaining chip. Even if you don't think Poile deserves the benefit of the doubt, this isn't enough to start jumping to conclusions with. Based on the direction the roster is going in for next season, you have to figure Trenin fits into the plan and a deal will get done.
The fact Poile hasn't even made them an offer is what blows my mind. I mean maybe he's waiting on something but you wait to long and there won't be anything to wait on.Let's keep in mind Trenin's a 23-year-old player who's scored 2 NHL goals. Although, he hasn't been given a good look in the big league, he's still isn't the next coming of Gretzky, he's probably a decent bottom-6'er if anything.
In this situation where we're looking to clean house, I'd still be pretty disappointed if we lost him for nothing. In the games he played, he looked physical and energetic, something we need right now to our team.
The fact Poile hasn't even made them an offer is what blows my mind.
Might as well give him a one way deal, it's looking possible that the AHL might not even play.Do we actually know that's a fact? I think earlier in this thread it was stated that the agent said Poile hadn't offered a ONE-WAY deal; that implies to me that he HAS offered Trenin a contract, but at least one year of it is two-way. Which I'm fine with. Trenin isn't some 18-year-old phenom that's about to set the league on fire. He's a guy who seems like he might be a decent bottom-six player who hasn't managed to get into the NHL full-time yet. Yeah I'd like to see him on the team. I'd love it if he turned out to be a good middle-six guy who could pot 20 goals. But I certainly haven't seen that from him.
Do we actually know that's a fact? I think earlier in this thread it was stated that the agent said Poile hadn't offered a ONE-WAY deal; that implies to me that he HAS offered Trenin a contract, but at least one year of it is two-way. Which I'm fine with. Trenin isn't some 18-year-old phenom that's about to set the league on fire. He's a guy who seems like he might be a decent bottom-six player who hasn't managed to get into the NHL full-time yet. Yeah I'd like to see him on the team. I'd love it if he turned out to be a good middle-six guy who could pot 20 goals. But I certainly haven't seen that from him.