LetsGoBLUES91
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2013
- 9,158
- 3,096
Meh at least y'all got football back. Be glad.
Rams and Seahawks never had that big of a rivalry anyway.
Wasn't talking about the Seahawks. Or the Rams. Or football.
Meh at least y'all got football back. Be glad.
Rams and Seahawks never had that big of a rivalry anyway.
Ah BlackhawksWasn't talking about the Seahawks. Or the Rams. Or football.
Not to mention how difficult it is to get to the stadium. But they had Wrestlemania there so Vince has a relationship with them. Same links made to the team in Tampa.The NY team playing at MetLife is a horrible idea because a few thousand fans in an 80k stadium and the pictures of it all over social media are going to be a gigantic black eye.
Am I the only one who doesn't get the point of this at all?
20 years ago it was presented as an NFL alternative where the players could still murder each other.
Now there's no stark difference, because they definitely aint gonna be destroying each other with everything we've learned about CTE since they failed.
What point is there to watch?
Am I the only one who doesn't get the point of this at all?
20 years ago it was presented as an NFL alternative where the players could still murder each other.
Now there's no stark difference, because they definitely aint gonna be destroying each other with everything we've learned about CTE since they failed.
What point is there to watch?
So you can gamble on it.
I can’t imagine anyone but fools betting on the original XFL. Results seemed largely random, rules were changing weekly or over the course of individual games. There would’ve been calls to refund bets in some cases.
More to the point, 20 years ago it was piggybacking off the WWE’s popularity during the Attitude era, with the same branding and marketing (sex, vulgarity, violence, etc.)
What’s the marketing angle this time? I realize there’s now a kitsch, retro appeal now to the original XFL, almost a certain fondness in spite of how hard it failed. But there was a reason it failed, the actual product was boring, almost unwatchable football. Same issue that every failed ‘spring league’ has had.
I can’t imagine anyone but fools betting on the original XFL. Results seemed largely random, rules were changing weekly or over the course of individual games. There would’ve been calls to refund bets in some cases.
Playing in nfl stadiums with crowds around 20k is a bad look. Ideally target mls stadiums where it looks full. But not every city they went to has that.I think with social media and what not, XFL has better chance of working in 2019 then 1999.
But I am baffled why they went to markets with NFL teams.
In fact they only went with one MLS sized stadium.Playing in nfl stadiums with crowds around 20k is a bad look. Ideally target mls stadiums where it looks full. But not every city they went to has that.
Doesn't help that they seemingly put Charlie Kelly in charge of naming the teams. "Give me Dragons! Battle Hawks- we will we will rock you!"
Playing in nfl stadiums with crowds around 20k is a bad look. Ideally target mls stadiums where it looks full. But not every city they went to has that.
I think with social media and what not, XFL has better chance of working in 2019 then 1999.
But I am baffled why they went to markets with NFL teams.