XFL and Disney reach multi-year agreement to air games

Big Z Man 1990

Registered User
Jun 4, 2011
2,569
368
Don't say anything at all
It could have made sense to replace Fox as a broadcast partner with CBS Sports, but with the broadcast portion going to The CW to start building that network into a legitimate contender, and Paramount Network airing the cable portion.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,486
2,783
It could have made sense to replace Fox as a broadcast partner with CBS Sports, but with the broadcast portion going to The CW to start building that network into a legitimate contender, and Paramount Network airing the cable portion.

CBS sports network is on way way less tvs than the former NBCSN national network.
 

Big Z Man 1990

Registered User
Jun 4, 2011
2,569
368
Don't say anything at all
CBS sports network is on way way less tvs than the former NBCSN national network.
That's why I didn't mention it in my post, instead saying Paramount Network, which is a similar network in scope to FX.

And I will never understand what you people have against The CW. It is just as much a network as ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC. And adding sports will only make it even more so.
 

Acesolid

The Illusive Bettman
Sep 21, 2010
2,538
323
Québec
I think this makes sense as a TV deal. What doesn't make sense is the USFL and the XFL somehow competing week after week.

Personally I think their medium-term coexistance is impossible. It's likely they'll both quickly fold... but I guess technically one could eat the remains of the first to fail and become somewhat viable... but that'd be a first.
 

Section 104

Registered User
Sep 12, 2021
637
659
Third time is the charm? I guess spring football leagues exist so people can lose money quicker than betting it on the roulette wheel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oknazevad

TheRumble

Registered User
Feb 19, 2009
1,465
2,285
Third time is the charm? I guess spring football leagues exist so people can lose money quicker than betting it on the roulette wheel.

Only reason it failed the second time was because of covid. It was just poorly timed and had its legs cut off before it had a chance. A start up league operating without gate reciepts was gonna cost the WWE a massive amount of money.

America loves football more now than it ever does. I think - assuming there is no covid-24, it succeeds this time around.
 

oknazevad

Registered User
Dec 12, 2018
470
330
That's why I didn't mention it in my post, instead saying Paramount Network, which is a similar network in scope to FX.

And I will never understand what you people have against The CW. It is just as much a network as ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC. And adding sports will only make it even more so.
It isn't just as much of a network, as has been explained to you as nauseam. You just refuse to listen to anyone telling you why you're wrong.
 

Big Z Man 1990

Registered User
Jun 4, 2011
2,569
368
Don't say anything at all
Furthermore, Fox had fewer primetime hours at the launch of their primetime than that of The CW.

The CW was able to cobble up six straight nights of primetime right away (they didn't program Saturday nights until 2021) because programming-wise, it was a merger of UPN and The WB with few new shows.

Fox on the other hand, needed to take until 1992 to get that many nights on their primetime schedule, and until 1993 to have primetime seven nights a week.

Granted The CW stopped programming on Sunday nights for a time. Still, Fox had a seven-night schedule for just less than 2 years when it started broadcasting the NFL.
 

Big Z Man 1990

Registered User
Jun 4, 2011
2,569
368
Don't say anything at all
If CW employees were reading all these posts attacking the idea of sports on their network they'd be so ashamed.

Many CW shows have large fanbases, such as the Arrowverse. Sports would be a good way to enlarge these fanbases because then their primetime shows would be getting good advertising.
 

IU Hawks fan

They call me IU
Dec 30, 2008
28,602
2,922
NW Burbs
What you either fail to understand or refuse to, is that FOX came to being because Murdoch owned several stations in big markets. That allowed him to build a real network.

The CW isn't a "real" network. It's a very loose affiliation of stations and controlled by competiting organizations. Neither Paramount or Warner Brothers Discovery has any incentive to acquire sports rights for it, they have their own properties to focus those dollars on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oknazevad

awfulwaffle

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
11,896
1,925
Dallas, TX
Furthermore, Fox had fewer primetime hours at the launch of their primetime than that of The CW.

The CW was able to cobble up six straight nights of primetime right away (they didn't program Saturday nights until 2021) because programming-wise, it was a merger of UPN and The WB with few new shows.

Fox on the other hand, needed to take until 1992 to get that many nights on their primetime schedule, and until 1993 to have primetime seven nights a week.

Granted The CW stopped programming on Sunday nights for a time. Still, Fox had a seven-night schedule for just less than 2 years when it started broadcasting the NFL.
Is CW like your favorite station and always shows up first when you turn on the tv or something?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad