"At evenstrength this year he has pretty much been Blake Wheeler."
Wheeler: 2.06p/60, 1.37p1/60, 50.4cf% (-2.4rel), 51.7xgf% (-1.4rel)
Hyman: 1.69p/60, 1.43p1/60, 50.7cf% (-0.0rel), 52.6xgf% (+2.5rel)
now you had 2 choices here:
1."whoa hyman is matching or bettering wheeler in most every category other than secondary assists - this is surprising to me because wheeler is awesome. maybe hyman is better than i thought. maybe this sheds some light on a hyman-lowry comparison."
or
2."LULZ I CAN'T BELIEVE HE SAID HYMAN>WHEELER LOLLLLLOZZ"
You chose the latter.
Perhaps your first statement would've been slightly less ridiculous if you'd said, "he has pretty much been Blake Wheeler, provided you ignore a lot of Wheeler's points."
Wait...no still ridiculous. And, it's insane to think that people should read what you actually said and interpret it to mean #1 above. It sheds no light on anything, just discounts Wheeler in a bizarre way.