Henkka
Registered User
Data from this season from Evolving-Hockey
Nyquist looks pretty good in here.
Asking a 1st should be a no-brainer.
I don't understand why people want our second best player gone who is also in the middle of his prime. In three years, he's the type of player we'll need when we are contending.
Contending for what? A playoff spot? I do not expect Gus to be a particularly good and effective hockey player three years from now.
Contending for what? A playoff spot? I do not expect Gus to be a particularly good and effective hockey player three years from now.
His style of play ages well.
If he was a better, more technically efficient skater I would tend to agree with you. I don't think he will age nearly as well as people are hoping he will.
I remember last year mentioning how well Nyquist was playing all season despite the production not really being any different, thought it was best season since 13-14
im glad his production has jumped to match his (now even more) elevated play
If you truly believe he's as good as the majority of the guys on that list he should be traded for a good offensive defenseman in his prime. Does anyone honestly think he'd bring that sort of return?View attachment 178457
Data from this season from Evolving-Hockey
Nyquist looks pretty good in here.
Asking a 1st should be a no-brainer.
View attachment 178457
Data from this season from Evolving-Hockey
Nyquist looks pretty good in here.
Asking a 1st should be a no-brainer.
It looks impressive, but how exactly is Rantanen at the bottom of the list?
I would bring him back.I'd definitely try to trade him at the deadline. I won't be upset if they end up bringing him back.