F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 18,630
- 5,893
There's been a lot of talk (at least among the media) about the Canucks possibly extending Markstrom. At the beginning of the season I wouldn't even think of doing that. By the middle of the season when Markstrom started playing well I thought for sure I would wait until the end of next season as I wanted to see a larger sample size. Now, I have kind of opened up to the idea of extending Markstrom.
I have ruled out the possibly of extending Markstrom for only a year. I don't think that's a realistic possibility. In terms of money, Kostinen + has been brought up as a likely comparable and I think that is likely a realistic ball park.
At the end of the day, I think I will go with wait and see followed by nothing beyond 2 year extension. I wonder how many here are absolutely confident in Markstrom going forward (for the next 3 years at least).
I have ruled out the possibly of extending Markstrom for only a year. I don't think that's a realistic possibility. In terms of money, Kostinen + has been brought up as a likely comparable and I think that is likely a realistic ball park.
At the end of the day, I think I will go with wait and see followed by nothing beyond 2 year extension. I wonder how many here are absolutely confident in Markstrom going forward (for the next 3 years at least).