Would ya look at that?: Mo is a bonafide #1 dman

Subway Schenn

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
1,346
1,302
London, UK
Guy should be getting paid over 7M.

Now taking off offensively (if you watched him in junior, you knew it was coming), having developed a stable defensive game and becoming a major leader on this team. I would consider making him captain, though Auston seems destined for it.

What a beaut, and we've had him from the beginning!
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnny_rudeboy

Falon

Registered User
May 21, 2004
2,113
36
Kitchener, Ontario
Genuine homegrown #1 defenseman take time. Occasionally they develop early like Doughty or Hedman, but typically not. I have no problem putting Reilly on that list. Where he ranks is a matter of opinion, but he's earned his spot on that list.
 

DavePoulin4PM

2x NHL all star, Selke winner, NHL exec
Nov 6, 2017
1,570
2,229
He has too many limitations to be considered a #1. On a contending team he is a #2 or 3. His poor hockey IQ is something he will never overcome. He has been in the league multiple years and still has rookie brain farts, and he doesn’t understand situational hockey.

He is a great skater and moves the puck well. It’s too bad he is a low IQ player and isn’t difficult to play against at all, or else he would be a #1.

Just because he is the #1 on one of the worst defensive units the NHL has seen this decade, doesn’t make him a number one. That’s like saying David Desharnais was a #1 center in MTL...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OppositeLocK

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
He has too many limitations to be considered a #1. On a contending team he is a #2 or 3. His poor hockey IQ is something he will never overcome. He has been in the league multiple years and still has rookie brain farts, and he doesn’t understand situational hockey.

He is a great skater and moves the puck well. It’s too bad he is a low IQ player and isn’t difficult to play against at all, or else he would be a #1.

Just because he is the #1 on one of the worst defensive units the NHL has seen this decade, doesn’t make him a number one. That’s like saying David Desharnais was a #1 center in MTL...
We ARE a contending team. #1 in the NHL standings currently.
In Toronto any mistake is magnified. Matthews made Doughty look like a rookie on Monday night. Doughty was BRUTAL.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
Contending for the presidents trophy.. sure. Stanley Cup with this defense? Lol 0% chance. Keep dreaming.
You have missed the past 3 years in the playoffs then. Pens won 2 years ago with Hainsey their 2nd in TOI.
Everyone always only talks about our defense. Will Boston ever win a cup with their centres? How are teams going to deal with Matthews/Tavares/Kadri on the ice every second when benches are shortened in a playoff series?
 

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,899
13,905
Toronto
He's the best defenseman the Leafs have had since probably Salming.I never watched Salming but our teams weren't great for a while so it was Kaberle before Rielly.
 

Advanced stats

Registered User
May 26, 2010
11,651
7,551
He has too many limitations to be considered a #1. On a contending team he is a #2 or 3. His poor hockey IQ is something he will never overcome. He has been in the league multiple years and still has rookie brain farts, and he doesn’t understand situational hockey.

He is a great skater and moves the puck well. It’s too bad he is a low IQ player and isn’t difficult to play against at all, or else he would be a #1.

Just because he is the #1 on one of the worst defensive units the NHL has seen this decade, doesn’t make him a number one. That’s like saying David Desharnais was a #1 center in MTL...
You're stuck in 2015 man. Time to move on.

Rielly is top 20 in the league
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
3 GA for the Leafs the past 2 games against "Playoff Teams" (Ridiculous argument, LA is terrible, Montreal is much better).
They are 6-1 with save % under .900. Their goaltending has been crap. The overall D looks fine. Dermott and Og on the 3rd-pairing is really good for any team.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
Burke did a lot of good for this team. Unfortunately he matched it with equally as many bad things .
He was too obsessed with size and toughness. Rielly was a guy he couldn't ignore since he had a top 5 pick.
 

Kubus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2014
803
31
We ARE a contending team. #1 in the NHL standings currently.
In Toronto any mistake is magnified. Matthews made Doughty look like a rookie on Monday night. Doughty was BRUTAL.
Exactly, the only people that hold that opinion that Doughty is so mistake free don't watch him play. Yes, Doughty is a bit better than Rielly defensively, but it's not that huge.
 

Liminality

Registered User
Oct 22, 2008
13,366
4,013
Exactly, the only people that hold that opinion that Doughty is so mistake free don't watch him play. Yes, Doughty is a bit better than Rielly defensively, but it's not that huge.
Oh I think Doughty is better defensively alright but I think people have this weird idea that top defenders on other teams don't ever get beat wide or make mistakes. Maybe if you're Lidstrom that's true but every other big name, Norris trophy winning dman gets beat and makes mistakes.
 

SeaOfBlue

The Passion That Unites Us All
Aug 1, 2013
35,591
16,773
3 GA for the Leafs the past 2 games against "Playoff Teams" (Ridiculous argument, LA is terrible, Montreal is much better).
They are 6-1 with save % under .900. Their goaltending has been crap. The overall D looks fine. Dermott and Og on the 3rd-pairing is really good for any team.

It has not been crap. Andersen has been shaky in a few games, but that's not unusual for him. Sparks has done well, considering he did very well against LA and hung in against a tough team. It did not help the Leafs had easily their worst defensive effort against the likes of Toews, Kane, DeBrincat, etc. in his first game in the NHL for a while. Andersen would likely have not done much better in those circumstances, especially if his Ottawa game was any indication... He was the reason the Leafs lost that game.
 

diceman934

Help is on the way.
Jul 31, 2010
17,326
4,137
NHL player factory
He has too many limitations to be considered a #1. On a contending team he is a #2 or 3. His poor hockey IQ is something he will never overcome. He has been in the league multiple years and still has rookie brain farts, and he doesn’t understand situational hockey.

He is a great skater and moves the puck well. It’s too bad he is a low IQ player and isn’t difficult to play against at all, or else he would be a #1.

Just because he is the #1 on one of the worst defensive units the NHL has seen this decade, doesn’t make him a number one. That’s like saying David Desharnais was a #1 center in MTL...
I read until you wrote poor hockey iq and stopped it is his biggest strength other then his skating.
 

diceman934

Help is on the way.
Jul 31, 2010
17,326
4,137
NHL player factory
Exactly, the only people that hold that opinion that Doughty is so mistake free don't watch him play. Yes, Doughty is a bit better than Rielly defensively, but it's not that huge.
Doughy was on the ice for how many goals last game against. He got beat out of the wall for the first goal.
 

TimeZone

Make the pick
Sep 15, 2008
19,670
8,189
Lost
He has too many limitations to be considered a #1. On a contending team he is a #2 or 3. His poor hockey IQ is something he will never overcome. He has been in the league multiple years and still has rookie brain farts, and he doesn’t understand situational hockey.

He is a great skater and moves the puck well. It’s too bad he is a low IQ player and isn’t difficult to play against at all, or else he would be a #1.

Just because he is the #1 on one of the worst defensive units the NHL has seen this decade, doesn’t make him a number one. That’s like saying David Desharnais was a #1 center in MTL...

Sometimes I wonder if certain posters even watch the sport. This is one of those posts that made me question that.

Using David Desharnais as an analogy for Morgan Rielly? At least try.
 

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
51,852
33,047
He's been exceptional to me, not only because of the points... and that's playing with Ron Freaking Hainsey.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
Exactly, the only people that hold that opinion that Doughty is so mistake free don't watch him play. Yes, Doughty is a bit better than Rielly defensively, but it's not that huge.
I have long made this argument that players in certain markets aren't seen, so their mistakes are not magnified like in Toronto. When McCabe scored on his own net and he'll never live that down, 5 other players did it that same season including Backstrom in the playoffs. Does anyone remember those?
When I hear OEL in Arizona is a #1 stud and top 5 D I laugh. Think on the Leafs he could get away with not having the stats and his team never winning and be considered that good?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skin Tape Session

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
21,172
23,496
I'd love to see Mo with a good quality, to top pairing RHD. Mo has played well so far, but I think someone who can focus defensively will really allow his game to blossom. (Instead of him having to cover his partner constantly.)
 

Smif

Registered User
Jan 23, 2008
9,840
3,669
Hamilton
He was too obsessed with size and toughness. Rielly was a guy he couldn't ignore since he had a top 5 pick.
Ya, the only guys to make it out of the Burke era are Rielly, Kadri, Gardiner and Brown. The only players that were acquired that he didn't demand size over skill.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad