It seems as though there is the chance, *however* slight, that Kaprizov may not ever report to the Wild. Surely they'd rather get value from that asset rather than watch the value of that asset diminish without ever coming to North America. However, I can't imagine that Minnesota would want to make another team significantly better by moving Kaprizov for an asset which doesn't do much for them.
Would Wild fans rather see Kaprizov stay in Russia, rather than collect a lesser asset and have him report for another NHL team? Obviously they'd prefer he report to Minnesota, but if that isn't an option would the Wild be looking for prospect, or an established vet, or something else...? Maybe keeping him away from a rival NHL club is enough use of an asset they can't have themselves.
Would Wild fans rather see Kaprizov stay in Russia, rather than collect a lesser asset and have him report for another NHL team? Obviously they'd prefer he report to Minnesota, but if that isn't an option would the Wild be looking for prospect, or an established vet, or something else...? Maybe keeping him away from a rival NHL club is enough use of an asset they can't have themselves.