Let me reframe this for you: if these players were as good as they thought they were, why are they having so much trouble winning a series? Why is Nick Foligno and company dominating these guys?
Lets take a basic comparison. STL extended Brayden Schenn contract's for 6.5M after putting up an average 0.8 ppg over 2 seasons. He also forechecks, backchecks, hits, and plays good defense. He's exactly a playoff type player.
Compare that to Marner who is getting paid 10.8M after averaging 0.92 ppg over 3 seasons.
Dubas isn't even close to the best GM, but is he really the worst? Brought in Muzzin, Brodie, flipped Kap for Hallander and 15th overall, draft Roberston and Sandin who both look to be great value picks so far. His drafting in general is looking quite good.
It's really hard for me to see him as the worst. The contracts - well, he overpaid Marner by 1.5 (based on Rants) and Matthews deal is too short. Nylander seems about right, Muzzin seems about right.
Are we really saying he worse than someone who signed Karlsson to his deal, and traded away a lotto pick? What about the guy that signed Myers to that awful contract? Is overpaying your stars by a couple million really worse, in your mind, to overpaying a #5 defenceman by 4 million (no to mention a couple other contracts).
I have to admit, Dubas hasn't become the top 5 executive I thought he would be - you guys got me. However, worst in the league because he overpaid a 95pt early 20's winger is a streeeetch.
Consider the absolutely bare cupboard for prospects he was left by Lou and Hunter. Why is that never taken into account? What about that hilariously bad Marleau contract? Or that he inherited the worst goaltending tandem in the NHL? (maybe a stretch, but it is now).
The worst evidence I've seen used is "he inherited a 105 pt team". Ya, with their 3 best players all on ELC deals. Would those teams really have been as good if they weren't paying the joke ELC rate to their 3 best players? Definitely not.