Saarinen with a clean bodycheck on the Canadian girl, but you can't do that in women's hockey, and Apps deflects one in on the powerplay.
2-0 Canada.
2-0 Canada.
Women's hockey GDT: Canada vs Finland
- Thread starter ScottyBowman
- Start date
- Status
I love this board....updates are so much faster than all the media blogs and live scoring websites out there.
colonel_korn
Luuuuuuuuuu....lay?
Dogbert said:
I agree, even for a "no-bodychecking" game I think that was a very chintzy penalty on the Finnish forward. They called it interference but the puck was right there.
Phil Parent
Sorel, 'fant d'chienne!
I can't resist asking it.
Earlier I saw Holst, Martin and Rooth from Team Sweden...2 of them were fugly, with manly haircuts and such...Martin was ok.
Now I see a few of the girls in this game and errrr.......
Well....let's be straight to the point and offend rather than hold back....
Would these girls be offended if you'd call them lesbians?
Earlier I saw Holst, Martin and Rooth from Team Sweden...2 of them were fugly, with manly haircuts and such...Martin was ok.
Now I see a few of the girls in this game and errrr.......
Well....let's be straight to the point and offend rather than hold back....
Would these girls be offended if you'd call them lesbians?
Borlag
Registered User
Phil Parent said:
They're there to play hockey, not to look hot or whatever it is that you're expecting from them. I'm sure they don't really care either way.
colonel_korn
Luuuuuuuuuu....lay?
^^^ 2-0 Canada, both goals on the PP
I agree, women hockey players certainly aren't the pinnacles of human beauty that male players such as Ricci, Chelios and Bertuzzi are.
Phil Parent said:
I agree, women hockey players certainly aren't the pinnacles of human beauty that male players such as Ricci, Chelios and Bertuzzi are.
I would say they would be offended. Even if some of them are lesbians, they probably would think it was none of our business and has nothing to do with hockey.
Would the guys be offended if you called one of them gay? Anyways, how about talking about hockey now. How's the game been? Pathfinder said Finland looked good for the first 15. So is it safe to assume that Canada looks fairly dominate?
HF-Addict
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2004
- 3,831
- 50
Women Hockey is so disapointing(as they left you always wanting more)....they look akward skating, they look like they will fall each second.......
Btw, do they have the right to hit? So many times there could have been highlights hits, huge hits in middle of the ice.......yet they do nothing
Wow......a penalty for looking like hockey (Canada).....a physical aspect....I know in Olympics (even men) there aren,t as many hits....but still, Olympics refs should let loose.
Btw, do they have the right to hit? So many times there could have been highlights hits, huge hits in middle of the ice.......yet they do nothing
Wow......a penalty for looking like hockey (Canada).....a physical aspect....I know in Olympics (even men) there aren,t as many hits....but still, Olympics refs should let loose.
GuloGulo
Registered User
PuckNut said:
Yes. A lot looks like 5-5 PP for the Canuckettes. Finland has trouble getting speed out of their own zone. Wickenheisser had a slapper in the cross bar. Canadian PK now.
That's a team!
Leafer4Life
Go Leafs Go!
McJadeddog
Registered User
Leafer4Life
Go Leafs Go!
- Status
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Stanley Cup 2024 Stanley Cup Champion - ONLY BET ONE TEAMWagers: 13Staked: $16,904.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
Series Winner Boston Bruins vs Toronto Maple LeafsWagers: 9Staked: $3,380.00Event closes
- Updated:
-