Hes been fine, it's a matter of trying to manufacture more goal scoring in the lineup.What’s with everyone dumping on Deslauriers all the sudden? He plays his role decently enough compared to the rest of the underperforming roster.
Hes been fine, it's a matter of trying to manufacture more goal scoring in the lineup.What’s with everyone dumping on Deslauriers all the sudden? He plays his role decently enough compared to the rest of the underperforming roster.
I agree with you. Des is the only one on the team that got some fight in him. The rest of the team looks like a bunch of quitters, especially rakellWhat’s with everyone dumping on Deslauriers all the sudden? He plays his role decently enough compared to the rest of the underperforming roster.
Hes been fine, it's a matter of trying to manufacture more goal scoring in the lineup.
It's a cumulative thing though, and that fourth line would play more than the one we have had out there.Thats fair, but Deslauriers has a surprisingly lethal wrist shot and I doubt someone like Heinen is going to put the puck in the net in limited 4th line minutes.
It's a cumulative thing though, and that fourth line would play more than the one we have had out there.
This is ostensibly what people want with our blue chippers, that the org take great care with them. I don't think the outrage on his behalf at his usage, or complaining that his line mates are somehow beneath him, is at all warranted.Trevor Zegras' NHL debut: What we learned about how the Ducks can let him succeed
Stephens chronicled every shift with quotes from players and the coaching staff. Eakins reiterated that his shifts were designed to put him in the best possible position to succeed and the times he was shifted for were purely cases of trying to protect him and had nothing to do with his play.
I'm sure he will be put in more situations every game as he learns.
Fair points but I don't want him around this tirefire, same with Lundy and even Mahura who I have advocated staying in the lineup......put them in a positive environment and let them develop, and the Gulls are that place.He was the best Duck on the ice tonight. He took a struggling Steel and Silf and they played in the offensive zone all night, until Eakins benched Zegras in third for Grant and they gave up with game tying goal.
I dont see how people aren't seeing how good this guy already is only 2 games in.
I’m really curious to see he stays up with the big club. The Ducks are better with him in the lineup, but I’m not convinced that’s best for his development.
I see that point. I'm 100% all for what is better for his long term development. In San Diego he builds confidence and doesn't have to deal with the toxicity of a bottom feeder losing environment. At the same time though the Gulls don't have the skill to keep up with him. I've watched a bunch of Gulls games and guys struggle to make clean passes, receive passes, get open, control the puck in the offensive zone. The game is constantly in transition because teams don't have the skill to setup plays and execute. The NHL also gives Zegras time to adapt to the size and physicality.Fair points but I don't want him around this tirefire, same with Lundy and even Mahura who I have advocated staying in the lineup......put them in a positive environment and let them develop, and the Gulls are that place.
If he was a Leafs prospect: 81 overall with high elite potential.EA finally added him to NHL21. 78 overall LW/C playmaker with medium elite potential.
/nörd
If made by Leafs fans, it would be 90+ overall with Generational Potential, because you know, Leaf fans.If he was a Leafs prospect: 81 overall with high elite potential.
They pretty much are already doing this. Only Rakell is at 2nd line minutes, excluding Agozzino’s 1 game, and there are twelve players clustered between 11:32 (Grant) and 14:05 ESTOI. 13 players are between 19.5 and 22.9 shifts/game.Maybe, but on the other hand if you roll four lines you are taking ice time away from the creative players (Zegras, Getzlaf, Comtois, Terry, Rakell) on the other three lines.
Please. Scoring goals against kindergarteners or scoring goals against college kids when you are 12. You get much more confidance beating the big boys and hes shown he canI see that point. I'm 100% all for what is better for his long term development. In San Diego he builds confidence and doesn't have to deal with the toxicity of a bottom feeder losing environment. At the same time though the Gulls don't have the skill to keep up with him. I've watched a bunch of Gulls games and guys struggle to make clean passes, receive passes, get open, control the puck in the offensive zone. The game is constantly in transition because teams don't have the skill to setup plays and execute. The NHL also gives Zegras time to adapt to the size and physicality.
I'm not advocating either way to be clear. I'm a huge believer in building confidence in young players but I just see pros and cons.
He was the best Duck on the ice tonight. He took a struggling Steel and Silf and they played in the offensive zone all night, until Eakins benched Zegras in third for Grant and they gave up with game tying goal.
I dont see how people aren't seeing how good this guy already is only 2 games in.