I think this is the most reasonable assessment of Connor compared to his peers in this thread but in all honesty I still think it's too high. I believe that Connor will be a heck of a player but I don't see any argument that would lead me to have Connor ahead of any of those 5 guys. Rantanen I would put in that group as well as he far out produced Connor's d+2 AHL season in his D+1 season in the AHL.
I think that there's a pretty legitimate case to have Konecny, and Hanifin ahead of Connor right now as well as both of these guys have similar upside and have shown well in the NHL where Connor struggled for most of his time.
I would put Connor in the same tier as Zacha, Beuvillier, Branon Carlo, Chabot, Eriksson-Ek, Boeser, and Christian Fischer. Which would be the tier spanning 10-17
Connor has incredible upside and skill and he's a great prospect but I think that this discussion is overlooking the ridiculous amount of high end talent that was pumped out in his draft year.