Pavels Dog
Registered User
There is nothing to stop the GR coach from playing him like a 3rd pairing D either. At least I have never heard of the Wings actually controlling a prospects icetime down there.We want 150% want control. "Earning" his ice time is some bull**** GM/coach speak that is used to keep the true decision making process private. Controlling his ice time doesn't mean that we just give him 25 minutes each night right off the bat because we want to, but it does mean that we determine what is the appropriate level of challenge to place on his shoulders.
Things we can control in Grand Rapids that are uncontrollable with Mannheim would be: quality of competition, overall ice time, situational ice time (powerplay and/or penalty kill), and timeline of progression. In Mannheim, there is nothing to stop their coach from casting him as a 3rd pairing defenseman with no powerplay time for a full season again. It's been suggested the way they operate in the DEL and how roles are awarded is tied to time served. In Grand Rapids, we would at least have the ability to control the minor variables to challenge him the right amount, and to adjust the variables on the fly as he develops and becomes more comfortable.
Earning icetime is how it works in pro leagues and I don't know that there's any evidence for handing out icetime for free being a better strategy.
The thing is though; if Seider isn't good enough to be a legit top 4D this season in either Mannheim or GR, he should be in juniors instead. Better to let his own performance dictate where he plays rather than being set on playing him somewhere where he will play a lot regardless of whether he deserves it or not.